Which one? | |||
| Metroid Warriors | 2 | 4.55% | |
| Hyrule Warriors 2 | 9 | 20.45% | |
| Mushroom Warriors (Mario) | 4 | 9.09% | |
| Lylat Warriors (Star fox) | 3 | 6.82% | |
| Halo Warriors | 0 | 0% | |
| Darksider Warriors | 1 | 2.27% | |
| Arkham Warriors | 3 | 6.82% | |
| Smash warriors (heroes/villians from smash) | 12 | 27.27% | |
| ...The above idea sounds so good... | 1 | 2.27% | |
| ...I can't even type any other ideas... | 9 | 20.45% | |
| Total: | 44 | ||
Before I came into this thread, I wanted Atelier Warriors. Upon making this comment, I want Final Fantasy Warriors.
Any cross-over that doesn't include "Dynasty Warriors". I'm hoping Miyamoto was suggesting that Nintendo will be working with all sorts of publishers on new cross-overs, rather than sticking some more Nintendo skins on a tired franchise like "Warriors".
Retro Tech Select - My Youtube channel. Covers throwback consumer electronics with a focus on "vid'ya games."
Latest Video: Top 12: Best Games on the N64 - Special Features, Episode 7
| Veknoid_Outcast said: I think badgenome has the right idea. Final Fantasy has over a dozen games, scores of playable and non-playable characters, and a legion of devoted fans. Plus, the sword and sorcery setting would mesh well with the Warriors framework. |
Except that we already have Dissidia, which does the fighting game at least as well as the Warriors formula would. I would much rather see a party-size combat with Dissidia's framework than anything with the Warriors framework.
For my money I want a MINECRAFT Warriors game.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
