Is this whole thing another plea for your "Allow us to call idiots, idiots" motion?

I'm just putting numbers in for the finished surveys. I'm kinda burnt out today so I'm staying away from human interaction.

Plot Twist: RadishHead didn't do very well.

You don't say

Apart from getting Mr Khan's reasoning behind the dismissal, is there something else to discuss?

I've sent him a PM so he should be popping by when he comes back.

Huh, I like radishhead... But I can't recall seeing him post anywhere in the last year...  Could you tell which survey was mine?

I don't know what you're talking about. :D

Right in one. I honestly didn't read the post in question, it went out in the pile as soon as i saw Rol was reporting himself.

I should learn to trust him more.

RolStoppable said: Ka-pi96 said: Yay, I got it right! At least Rol can admit when he is breaking the rules then. You wouldn't see many people reporting themselves I don't consider the post that got me banned wrong. It was merely a tool to be a means to an end. I deserved punishment for being an idiot, but mods do not ban people for stupidity. Therefore I did set things into place to achieve the correct result. ... Something else has surfaced. *EDIT: I want to know if Anfebious received a moderation. Did he?* RolStoppable posted something on Anfebious's wall: You are a coward. 37 minutes ago | 1 comments | Add comment If it's because of that comment I posted in your wall I'll have you know it was deleted by Coney the meanie dog! But that's beside the point, I AM a coward! That's why I don't post the word idiot. 0 minutes ago

In a sense. He was PM'd to inform him that such posts aren't acceptable after the comment was deleted. However as I discussed at the time, the rules about posting on walls and the general lack of severity of the post (there wasn't really an awful lot wrong with what he posted; however to avoid further issues from arising we deleted the comment and sent him a PM warning him. 

If what you are asking is "did he get away with it?", then no. It wasn't just deleted with no consequence. 

That's right. Upon reflection, would an official moderation have been more appropriate? Perhaps, and perhaps a greater level of consistancy needs to be levelled when considering these matters in the future. I'll be sure to discuss the matter with the other mod(s) whom were involved in the discussion at the time and see their take on the matter; and whilst this instance won't be altered it's definitely something that we can learn from and take onboard in future to avoid another such issue. 

Consistancy is something that I, or we as a mod team, strive for. Everyone should be treated fairly and without bias, and I definitely think it's something that has improved. Is there still some way to go to achieve this? Sure, but we're always trying to improve (the recent mod survey is evidence) and this is another example.