By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Assassin's Creed Unity is 900p/30fps on both PS4 & Xbox One 'to avoid all the debates and stuff'

Theonemind on 06 October 2014
160rmf said:

just like fanboys

What's your point? 



Around the Network
Protendo on 06 October 2014
true_fan said:
Ps4 must have held back to XB1 version with that tablet CPU. In the article they mentioned "Unity could run at 100fps if it was just graphics, but AI is the problem." So, in essence Ubisoft could have run the AI calculation using Azure for the XB1. So much for parity, darn ps4 holding back games with their last gen technology.

Head in the clouds.



How are the next-gen consoles trending on social media?  Why are they popular? Join Social Media Monthly to find out what everyone is talking about!

"And everyone's Kickstarter has merit." - Malory Archer 

Kane1389 on 06 October 2014
Euphoria14 said:
So PS4 version intentionally held back?

Poor form Ubi.


This is gonna cause a major shitstorm at GAF lol



Nate4Drake on 06 October 2014
Euphoria14 said:
So PS4 version intentionally held back?

Poor form Ubi.

$$$ from MS. How to blame them.  



”Every great dream begins with a dreamer. Always remember, you have within you the strength, the patience, and the passion to reach for the stars to change the world.”

Harriet Tubman.

SubiyaCryolite on 06 October 2014
super6646 said:

Maybe you guys should read the full article before whining, because they stated the game was 'cpu bound'. The XBOX ONE in fact has a slightly better CPU to make up for its lower GPU power. Thus no one is holding no one back, yet people try to tell xboner's that they're pieces of crap and that the PS4 is much more powerful. Well what about PES 2015, no one was bitching when we xboners (I actually have got use to the name) had to deal with the same 720p 60 fps as ps3 owners! PS3 OWNERS! I don't care what anyone would say but that was purely favoring the PS console, no matter what they add in. So I think you guys should shut up and stop complaining for an additional 600,000 pixels!


How does rendering at 1080p tax the CPU anymore than rendering in 900p would?



I predict that the Wii U will sell a total of 18 million units in its lifetime. 

The NX will be a 900p machine

Around the Network
true_fan on 06 October 2014
Theonemind said:
true_fan said:
Ps4 must have held back to XB1 version with that tablet CPU. In the article they mentioned "Unity could run at 100fps if it was just graphics, but AI is the problem." So, in essence Ubisoft could have run the AI calculation using Azure for the XB1. So much for parity, darn ps4 holding back games with their last gen technology.


You don't know what you are talking about... They have the same CPUs.... 

The XB1 CPU is faster than the ps4 CPU, and you completely ignored my comment about the cloud.



teigaga on 06 October 2014
bubblegamer said:
People have been saying ever since FFXIII went multiplat. Weaker consoles ultimately hold back the stronger one from achieving better performance. Glad first party devs don't have to deal with this.


DO we have any reason to believe that FInal Fantasy XIII was held back on PS3. The 360 version came on multiple discs (bluray used to capacity), the 360 version had ever so sligtly weaker graphics (not parity clause like this), the game looked the same from its first official ingame reveal to the its actual release. That was just sony fans being precious in my opnion. Also the crystal engines was shit for everything outside of characters models, shiny materials and pretty effects.



Protendo on 06 October 2014
SubiyaCryolite said:
super6646 said:

Maybe you guys should read the full article before whining, because they stated the game was 'cpu bound'. The XBOX ONE in fact has a slightly better CPU to make up for its lower GPU power. Thus no one is holding no one back, yet people try to tell xboner's that they're pieces of crap and that the PS4 is much more powerful. Well what about PES 2015, no one was bitching when we xboners (I actually have got use to the name) had to deal with the same 720p 60 fps as ps3 owners! PS3 OWNERS! I don't care what anyone would say but that was purely favoring the PS console, no matter what they add in. So I think you guys should shut up and stop complaining for an additional 600,000 pixels!


How does rendering at 1080p tax the CPU anymore than rendering in 900p would?


It wouldn't.  The difference could be accomplished via GPGPU.  A simple resolution boost isn't something that can't be offset.  Resolution doesn't require stronger AI.



How are the next-gen consoles trending on social media?  Why are they popular? Join Social Media Monthly to find out what everyone is talking about!

"And everyone's Kickstarter has merit." - Malory Archer 

GribbleGrunger on 06 October 2014



 

The PS5 Exists. 


Aura7541 on 06 October 2014
true_fan said:
Theonemind said:
true_fan said:
Ps4 must have held back to XB1 version with that tablet CPU. In the article they mentioned "Unity could run at 100fps if it was just graphics, but AI is the problem." So, in essence Ubisoft could have run the AI calculation using Azure for the XB1. So much for parity, darn ps4 holding back games with their last gen technology.


You don't know what you are talking about... They have the same CPUs.... 

The XB1 CPU is faster than the ps4 CPU, and you completely ignored my comment about the cloud.

The PS4 CPU still performs better due to the fact that its OS has way less overhead than the X1's OS, which holds back its CPU performance despite being clocked higher.