This comment is hilarious! I really enjoyed that. Thanks for the honest laugh :)

Ubisoft is now spinning hard that 30 fps is more cinematic and 60 fps actually ruins gaming experience. 

""At Ubisoft for a long time we wanted to push 60 fps. I don't think it was a good idea because you don't gain that much from 60 fps and it doesn't look like the real thing. It's a bit like The Hobbit movie, it looked really weird.

"And in other games it's the same - like the Rachet and Clank series [where it was dropped]. So I think collectively in the video game industry we're dropping that standard because it's hard to achieve, it's twice as hard as 30fps, and its not really that great in terms of rendering quality of the picture and the image."

http://www.techradar.com/news/gaming/viva-la-resoluci-n-assassin-s-creed-dev-thinks-industry-is-dropping-60-fps-standard-1268241

Next generation when PS5/XB2 are out, they'll be telling us how 4K gaming @ 60 Fps is the next revolution in gaming!

Ubisoft is making EA look good. 

Food for thought, once Naughty Dog and other Sony 1st party developers release next gen games that put AC Unity to shame in graphics and resolution, Ubisoft's programmers/managers will look very unprofessional.

Sorry if old :

Ubisoft’s reason to downgrade PS4 version of Assassin’s Creed is quite genius !

''Ubisoft’s reasoning for this was that the Xbox One can only do 900p/30 frames per second, and Ubisoft didn’t want to make Xbox One users feel inferior. Pontbriand said that they just limited the PS4 version to the Xbox One to “avoid all the debates and stuff”. This is despite the fact that the PS4’s GPU is 50% more powerful than the Xbox One’s, and can easily run games at 1080p.

But the exact opposite has happened: Ubisoft’s decision has caused far more debate than if they had just stuck with 1080p for the PlayStation 4 version. Last year’s Assassin’s Creed 4 was upgraded to full HD with a post-launch patch, but Ubisoft has made no such announcement so far for Unity.

Ubisoft’s reason to “avoid all debates and stuff” completely backfired — we’re talking more about this than we ever would have if the PS4 version offered 1080p from the get go. If that was the case, it would have been just another PS4 game that runs at a higher resolution that the Xbox One. It’s so common, it’s barely worth writing about these days.

But to purposefully downgrade the game? That’s worth writing about !!!''

Ubisoft’s reason to “avoid all debates and stuff” completely backfired — we’re talking more about this than we ever would have.

''And maybe that’s what Ubisoft intended. People are now talking about Assassin’s Creed Unity more than ever. In fact, nobody really talked about the game before — it was just another Assassin’s Creed game coming out. Now there’s a reason to talk about the game. And the people talking about it (especially PS4 gamers) are really passionate, which is a must for a good PR trick.

And when all this calms down and people start forgetting that it happened, Ubisoft will announce that the PlayStation 4 version of Assassin’s Creed Unity will get a patch to get it to 1080p — just like with the previous Assassin’s Creed game.

It’s quite genius, actually, and one of the better PR moves of the year !''

http://ps4daily.com/2014/10/ubisoft-ps4-downgrade/


Quite obvious if you ask me. So, PS4 owners might play it at 1080p after all, it's a possibility.

Far from the truth? Tell me, what truth am I far from?  You kept mentioning 4K gaming as if it was something big right now, arguing with Neodegenerate about it. I brought in facts. Truth that 4K is a very, very small part of gaming right now. Which supports Neodegenerate's stance for which you were arguing for no sane reason against.

Then again, that's pretty much what you always do, arguing for the sake of arguing, all the freaking time. Your agenda against the PS4 is bordering on trolling. And that's pretty much the only thing you do on VGC. Only a matter of time before you get what you (and, by extention, the community) deserve.

Now, that ludicrous mention about winning... Seriously, that tells a lot about your purpose on these forums. If you think everything is about fighting to win something here, it's no wonder you don't see how a discussion on forums can ever be constructive. You should give that misplaced over-inflated ego of yours a check. 

You know, considering the fact that this thread has gone on long enough to show that resolution matters a lot for some people, and some of those people being very vocal about it, I think it's safe to say it backfired hard.

What I do find interesting in all this mess is that typing in bold all the time doesn't get you banned.

They'd better not do that with The Division

Actually the point I was making was that the mainstream audience won't care about 4k until it is on their TVs.  A point you have, as of yet, been unable to dispute.

The PC market showing growth this year is all well and good, but again doesn't address the point of TVs being the standard setters for the mainstream audience.

Yes I am aware that gamers on PC can play in 4k.  Congrats to you?

I am not the guy you initially argued with.  I am the guy who asked to see a computer you could buy, for $400.00, that would give you the same, or better, gaming experience than a PS4.  You then decided to show a computer that you could buy cheap, but still need to actually put a new vid card in.

But yes I am glad we can finally agree that, we are done here.

I understand your point, and while steam does have more sales, you can find cheap console games either online or in retail shops too(and you can always buy used)

That aside tough, PC was always the superior choice, last gen was the same and -almost- nobody was into the resolution of the games.  You can play the "Superior" version on PC, but if the game sucks there is no resolution that gonna save the game from being bad.  And people should focus more on that