bungie have always sucked at storyline, frankly.
oni's storyline sucked
the storyline in all if the halos was forgettable (really, can you accurately tell someone the plot if each if the halo games without having played one really recently?
destinys story is soarse at best, but thats kinda the point, its an ongoing story thats meant to unfold over the lifetime of the game through updates, expansions and special events, everything else youre meant to fill in yourselves.

as it is right now, destiny isnt better than halo because of the story being to sparse, but in time it will be.
sorry if that upsets the halo diehards but its just the reality of things.

the music in destiny is one of the most praised aspects of it i have seen across multiple forums. 

Oh I know when a game is good and when a game has mediocre parts. Destiny's story/campaign for example, very mediocre. Not one notable character in the game. Strike missions are more engaging than the campaign even though they all have the exact same format over and over again. The multiplayer is an unbalanced turd that makes Halo 4's multiplayer look like a masterpiece. The best part of this game is playing with friends and leveling up after level 15.

I never take someone's opinion seriously when it's worded with an excessive amount of words like "mediocre", "crap", "shit", "turd", etc... To me, usage of such words to express one's "opinion" usually lies on foundations of bias, and/or gives away an obvious agenda. In my honest personal and individual own opinion, of course.

ultimately if you compare the story of halo with the story of destiny you are ignoring, either purposely or unintentionally, the vast difference that seperates the two.

Halo has you take on the role of an existing character, who the story is specifically crafted around, as such plenty of queues and plot twists can be used that directly effect the player, resulting in what feels like a more deep and engaging storyline.
Destiny on the other hand has you CREATE that main character, so the story has to be loose enough to work with not only the character you make but any character anyone makes, and also account for multiple characters existing in the same title.

what youre essentially doing is comparing apples to oranges, the proper comparison would be to take a random multiplayer character from halo and consider how much story that character has, you'll soon find it has little to none.

that key difference makes a huge impact to the story and makes comparing Destiny to games focusing on pre-existing, set characters, a rather narrow minded and inaccurate affair.

So my whole post is meaningless because I used the words mediocre and turd? Even though ive spent about 30 hours in Destiny? I understand turd is a bit harsh but mediocre is valid for explanations. 

Halo Reach uses your multiplayer character and puts him in the campaign. He doesn't even speak and it worked fine. Bungie may have said "F you" to the lore in that game but the story came out much more meaningful than Destiny's. 

you are still a set piece character in the campaign playing along side other set piece characters 

Nah, if Bungie owned Halo this would have been called Halo: Destiny.

It feels a lot like Halo, has a similar story, and very little innovation. This new IP was a business move, not a chance to do something new.

Same goes for Destiny no? Everyone has the same campaign. Just because you set a race, gender and guardian type doesn't mean you can't make a campaign with a decent story. You're making excuses for something plenty of games have done better.