I think those FH2 scores are pretty good!
---Member of the official Squeezol Fanclub---
What will be the highest rated game of the year? | |||
Bloodborne | 73 | 47.40% | |
Halo 5 | 17 | 11.04% | |
Rise of The Tomb Raider | 2 | 1.30% | |
Xenoblade Chronicles X | 28 | 18.18% | |
Forza 6 | 1 | 0.65% | |
Splatoon | 4 | 2.60% | |
Other | 13 | 8.44% | |
See results. | 15 | 9.74% | |
Total: | 153 |
I think those FH2 scores are pretty good!
---Member of the official Squeezol Fanclub---
AZWification said: I think those FH2 scores are pretty good! |
They sure are it got another pretty good review score that will go towards its metascore from gametrailers which gave it a 8.8 and another good review that will not go towards its metascore from 3KB (YouTubers) who gave it a 8.5.
Update (04/10/2014):
Added to 8th gen console exclusive graph/list:
- Forza Horizon 2 (86).
- Hyrule Warriors (75).
Added to 8th gen "PS4/X1 only" side graph/list:
- Middle-earth: SOM (85)
- Sherlock Holmes: C&P (75)
Small changes:
- Edited score of Forza 5 on 8th gen console exclusive list from 80 to 79.
- Edited FIFA 15 score from 83 to 82 on 8th gen side graph/list.
- Removed Sports Champions from 7th gen yearly graph.
- Added new poll "Which will score better, FH2 or Driveclub?"
People still take metacritic seriously?
FH2 is established IP with more content so it will score higher and DC is a new IP which is focusing on core driving in social aspect in different way. So, DC will get between 80-85 mostly as they point out the content as issue.
So, Feel Emotions, Experience Adventure/Action, Challenge Game, Solve puzzles and Have fun.
PlayStation is about all-round "New experiences" using new IP's to provide great diversity for everyone.
Xbox is always about Online and Shooting.
Nintendo is always about Fun games and milking IP's.
Imho Forza >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DriveClub
I hope that DriveClub will have less than 86 MC...
IdealisticNihilist said: People still take metacritic seriously? |
Metacritic does have its uses. They're perfect for making non-subjective comparisons on certain levels, especially when looking on a large scale (which compounds the initial effect of creating a generalized view). They're utterly useless for direct quality comparisons though, which is unfortunately what most people try to use it for :/
That all said, this thread is just for fun ^^ It's not intended to be taken too seriously.
Zekkyou said:
Metacritic does have its uses. They're perfect for making non-subjective comparisons on certain levels, especially when looking on a large scale (which compounds the initial effect of creating a generalized view). They're utterly useless for direct quality comparisons though, which is unfortunately what most people try to use it for :/ That all said, this thread is just for fun ^^ It's not intended to be taken too seriously. |
FIne, but: Gamerankings.com > Metacritic.
CosmicSex said: So every single Naughty Dog game from Gen 7 charted. That is unreal. |
Yep, they're the most critically acclaimed home console developer of the last half decade ^^ Not sure who was top for the whole 7th gen though, will have to check up on that. A lot would depend on if you use consistency as a criteria, or if you simply look at each developers "best" few titles.