And what might these points be? Or have you and he been talking in private?

Just trying to play all angles. We've only 55 minutes left, may as well try to get the most out of it.

He linked his post from 15 hours ago about 20-40 posts ago.

So you assume White isn't making an informed descision? You claim my thoughts on Carl were exaclty like my thoughts on theprof last game when it wasn't. You say my Playstyle this game is the same as last tho it is quite different. The prof finds Carl scummy for very different and logical reasons which you ignore and call him scum that agrees with my points, even tho his reasons are quite different. Now that one of the biggest suspects and lynch candidates is Astro where the majority of if not all the  people voting for him so far all seem to be quite smart, logical and experianced think he is the best lynch candidate. Instead of taking them and their reads seriously you would rather dismiss them and try to dogpile on me and discredit anyone that disagrees. Feels to me like you are trying to save your mafia team mate. TheProf seems to know you and astro very well and seems to think you are both mafia. Sure maybe he is mafia but then again he could easily be town and has read town for the most part.

Thanks y'all.

Not sure how I missed that bandwagon vote. Reading through the rest of his game it just seems like he isnt fully into the game itself. I suppose I could support a lynch on him as nothing else will happen. The whole "I have replies typed up but dont want to post them" grinds my gears too.

A lot of people have been bandwagoning Day 1. A lot of people have been inactive too. I need to go back through again and save all those bandwagon posts.

-

Im going to put my vote back on Nicklesbe, though. Id prefer to see him gone after that early game.

I vote Nicklesbe

He's refering to this: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6670226

And so the bandwagoning begins again, and not suprisingly from sparkss and Carl.

With such little time left I would have hoped Astro had said something more and sooner. For now tho.

Vote:Astrogamer

How is it a bandwagon?

I have been on you since my first post of the day. I never stopped being on you. 

Really? That kind of contradicts your actions throughout the day. Despite my actions it took you awhile to vote me. Why is that? 

1. He admitted himself that he doesn't read everything.
2. On the flip side, he came right to your rescue. He only started posting when you were in trouble, defending you a lot, attacking the people who suspected you.
3. Since when is that a good excuse to vote someone??? You should think for yourself. Also, it's the very definition of bandwagoning.
4. I did take their reads into consideration, and came to the conclusion that you are the better target.
5. Prof doesn't know me at all.

well is time for college. See you later guys