By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Starcraft Mafia - Game Thread - Concluded

Nicklesbe said:

Lets start with his first posts after roles were released. http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6653643 http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6653737 http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6653931 What was the intent behind those posts? Sure they were innocent maybe but clearly they had an intent of causing confusion.*{1} Also he switched up unimportant units but always ended with a quote from the queen of blades, the leader of the zerg*{2}, why not a quote from Jim? Or any other terran Character that you see for 90% of star craft 2? Either way it shows he assumed those races would be in this game.

Then I vote for him here: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6655782 Its clear there that I want to use the vote as a tool and get the ball rolling.

*fluff, snip*

Then he is completely inactive for a bit and doesn't pay attention until he sees a reason to attack me here: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6657974 and soon after http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6658094 Trying to manipulate and twist*{3} events saying it was a bandwagon vote even tho my vote was the first actual vote of the game and I was clear as pointed out in previous linked posts that the vote was not a serious vote and was only a pressure vote to get him to talk. This will not be the last time he tries to twist my words and history.

Spurg asks for a review which he completly ignores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6660200 *{4}

He gets asked directly by Wonk to pay attention and catch up: His answer is that he will put it off a day with a wonky excuse that he is trying to read people.http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6661854 which contradicts with the fact that he had been playing destiny(which FYI is not a valid excuse to not read some posts every few hours. It's a FPS MMO and he has a phone that he uses to check the site)*{5}

Then he is inactive once again until I have this interaction with Impertenance and it is very clear it has nothing to do with him.because theprof just voted along with you on Impertenance: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6663674 *{6}

Then more inactivity until White seemingly gives him an opportunity to cast faux suspicion on cone as well as attack me with terrible logic and reasoning that makes no sense. As well as assuming Mafia has day talk which indicated he knows more information that by all rights he shouldn't: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6664738 *{7}

I correcting stating either scum and mafia is interchangible and point out that him showing that he knows what it is called in this particuler game is actually a slip*{8} for him.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6665311

So you may not see it but he is definitly Mafia/scum. I hope that answers your question.

1. Oh my god, I'm facepalming. This is your case against prof all over again.
2. Are you even serious right now??
3. I don't get what your issue here is. Those are the events, in correct order. But you know what? I'll give you this one. It didn't seem like your vote was that serious. It certainly was baseless. Though technically, what he's saying is still accurate.
4-5. ...What is this now? I don't even know what this is anymore.
6. He answered that one.
7. Actually, funny you should mention it. When I first read your post, I found the way you worded it to be quite odd. It looked like you were the one who knew something, but could say it outright. No more coaching from me, though. The slips are too yummy.
8. There's one thing you're forgetting... Impertinence said it first. Why aren't you attacking him, hmm?

This whole "case" reminds me so much of your thing with prof last game it's not even funny. Though, back then I gave you the benefit of the doubt, and chalked up your utter and obvious bullshit to just noobiness and inexperience. Not this time. I mean what are some of those reasons? I know you don't really believe it.

You said it yourself. You'll try to gather whatever you can and focus on it to make it seem like a big deal when you know it's nothing. Except that whole huge post is full of nothing but facepalm worthy bullshit, and I know you know it. I guess you're getting your wish after all...

I vote Nicklesbe



Around the Network
Nicklesbe said:

You should also know from last game that I am willing to do anything to win. If that means sacrificing myself so town has some good leads then so be it. I am not giving up, simply trying to give town answers and hopefully finger some scum in the process.

This is my main gripe with your supposed reasoning. You sacrificing yourself would not give us any good leads whatsoever. There's always both town and mafia on lynch trains, often more town than scum.

I know you know this.

...This is so much more fun when you know the players better. Beforehand, I would have given you the benefit of the doubt.



Words Of Wisdom said:
impertinence said:
@WoW. How long do we have to put up with Fusioncode not doing anything what so ever? 2 days left of the Day, when will he be replaced?


Fusioncode has been prodded. 

You may request a prod at any time.  If the user does not respond to me or in the thread within a sufficient amount of time ( we'll say 24 hours ) then they will be replaced.

I am not trying to be an ass about this, I am just hoping that the replacement gets as much time as possible of what little is left of the Day to read and comment.

It's been 24 hours no?



impertinence said:
Finally. It is possible that the many obvious attempts to point out that people voting him will be scum is just a gamble to scare people from placing a vote on him and thus lead to someone else getting lynched while he basks in the towniness of his attempted self sacrifice. A risky gamble indeed if true.

I like the way you think.

Sorry if buddying, I couldn't help it : P



Wonktonodi said:
Carl2291 said:
Conegamer said:
You know, every time I get ready to post a big post I get called away to do something else. I move in 2 days; so things are a little hectic. But if/when I find the time to sit down with a nice long post, I'll do so. What I don't want to do is say "you, you and you are suspicious" without reasoning, because what benefit does that provide?


Im also calling bullshit on this, because your recent post history tells me that you have been online and posting a lot over the course of the day.

To be precise, 44(!) posts in the last 16-17 hours.


You have made some great points against cone. I think that actually calls for a vote. I'm am curious why you haven't voted at all this game though.


Im stuck between who to vote. Waiting on an answer from one of them to sway my decision.



                            

Around the Network
Sparks said:
Nicklesbe said:

You should also know from last game that I am willing to do anything to win. If that means sacrificing myself so town has some good leads then so be it. I am not giving up, simply trying to give town answers and hopefully finger some scum in the process.

This is my main gripe with your supposed reasoning. You sacrificing yourself would not give us any good leads whatsoever. There's always both town and mafia on lynch trains, often more town than scum.

I know you know this.

...This is so much more fun when you know the players better. Beforehand, I would have given you the benefit of the doubt.

So you say you would have given me the benefit of the doubt right after you tell me you wouldn't give me the benefit of the doubt because You "know me" does that make a lot of sense to you? 



http://www.youtube.com/v/AoOOpLpcF28 http://www.youtube.com/v/CphFZGH5030

All Hail the Jester King. The King is back, and I am still a dirty girl prof ;)

Wonktonodi said:
Carl2291 said:
Im also calling bullshit on this, because your recent post history tells me that you have been online and posting a lot over the course of the day.

To be precise, 44(!) posts in the last 16-17 hours.

You have made some great points against cone. I think that actually calls for a vote. I'm am curious why you haven't voted at all this game though.

Are you refering to the 44 posts? I disagree, but I want to hear from Cone first.



Sparks said:
Wonktonodi said:
Carl2291 said:
Im also calling bullshit on this, because your recent post history tells me that you have been online and posting a lot over the course of the day.

To be precise, 44(!) posts in the last 16-17 hours.

You have made some great points against cone. I think that actually calls for a vote. I'm am curious why you haven't voted at all this game though.

Are you refering to the 44 posts? I disagree, but I want to hear from Cone first.

I've posted some stuff already here if it helps.



 

Here lies the dearly departed Nintendomination Thread.

Nicklesbe said:

So you say you would have given me the benefit of the doubt right after you tell me you wouldn't give me the benefit of the doubt because You "know me" does that make a lot of sense to you? 

Talking about last game vs. this game. Yes, I would have let it slide before.

I wasn't lying before; we here, or maybe I should say I, have a soft spot for noobs.



Conegamer said:

I've posted some stuff already here if it helps.

Woops. Yeah, I'm catching up and posting as I go.

Though, unfortunately I gotta go do something irl right now :P