You should know how it works White, I know it was discussed last game.

Ok.I'm keeping it for now though.

Even more concerning: it's been discussed this game as well. Did you forget?

What exactly is your reason for voting for me anyways? The way I see, I saw someone voting you, before you even said anything for absolutly no reason. He gets asked several times about it, being evasive and then eventually lying and saying he did explain it but didn't actually. You don't really appear to be phased by that, say he is suspicious and then you jump on a vote train on me, (one of the few people to point out his suspicious behavior and vote for him after he did). So consider this a HoS because it looks like at this point that he was voting for a mafia team mate to try and look town, didn't have a valid reason for voting for you so he kept it secret and then lied. You then pay his actions little to no mind and then bandwaggon and join a lynch train on me.

@Everyone is that an accurate perception of events or am I wrong?

Bandwagoning is essentially joining in on votes for a player for no specific reason of your own.

An example would be me voting impertinence for say, asking a lot of questions, then you voting straight after saying "Yeah, Carl has a point!"

Conegamer bandwagoning on Nicklesbe earlier in the game after TruckOSaurus voted him for being overly defensive. I usually always see the added "gut feeling!" things, particularly after giving reasons someone else already brought up, as scummy signs.

For what its worth, I am currently suspicious of Conegamer, Nicklesbe and to a lesser extent Radishhead (for what he said early game). The No Lynch thing, when we have no real ideas on who is/isnt Scum, can be beneficial to Town providing we avoid a mis-lynch.

Nicklesbe and Cone have already been explained, through either irratic play and votes to bandwagoning. Calling for a mass vote on himself screamed  to me that his team mates told him to apply a "feel sorry for me" tactic. Conegamer is also a filthy lier, as can be seen here and here... 2 seperate "Ill post my thoughts!" posts in 2 days with no actual summary given while continuing to post a whole a lot in the thread.

The problem with that is that it assumes that there is daytalk...how can you possibly know there is any? As town all we can safely assume is that they can talk at night, it's not even safe to assume that there is a third type of faction that can talk with each other like neighbors and lovers.

You know, every time I get ready to post a big post I get called away to do something else. I move in 2 days; so things are a little hectic. But if/when I find the time to sit down with a nice long post, I'll do so. What I don't want to do is say "you, you and you are suspicious" without reasoning, because what benefit does that provide?

Also how is supporting a lynch(in this case against myself) that would lead to answers and likely finger many mafia in the process be considered "feel sorry for me tactic". I did not seek pity or beg, or cry, or even give up as many have claimed. I used my experience from last game with what happened to RCT and with how I played, and how I wouldn't be changing my style if at all. So I came into this game knowing due to last games meta I would be suspicious off the bat. Which so far has proven true. I attempted to trap and hopefully catch numerous mafia. If that means me getting lynched in order to do that then I am ok with that.

Assume everything, trust nobody and nothing until you have been thoroughly convinced otherwise.

With Starcraft being a natural 3 faction series with Terran, Protoss and Zerg Id fully expect to have 3 factions in this game (Maybe 4, with the one-off nuke guy).

That would be fine if you also assumed and considered there wasn't day talk but you didn't. As Theprof pointed out and even proved with his past experiance last game when people make one sided assumptions like this, it shows they have knowledge of something they should not have.

Is this your first game by chance because it is only my second and even I know it is dangerous to make any assumption.

As far as I know it is only safe to make 2 assumptions. You look at someone and what they say and first you assume they are town. Then you look at what they said it, how they said it, and why they said. What is their motivation? Their goal? Then you assume they are mafia and you do the same.

You consider everything, not assume everything. At this point you arn't assuming everything, you are assuming there is a daytalk and as far as I can tell you havn't even considered there is no day talk, as if you know there is day talk. If there is no daytalk then you arn't even considering that and probably missing slips. You jumped to a conclusion based on an assumption. That is a strong sign that you know something you shouldn't know. For now consider this an FoS.

If you are a town I suggest you take a step back and take a breath because you are acting very paranoid, being very self centered, and making dangerous assumptions. Perhaps that's because you got voted for right off the bat and you are feeling rattled and defensive. Then again maybe you are mafia and freaking out because I called you out at the start.