By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Starcraft Mafia - Game Thread - Concluded

Wonktonodi said:
Conegamer said:
Yeah, the day ends in just 7 hours. 7 hours!

It's time to sorta start posting rather than hanging back. I'm still up for Sparks; he seems like the safest bet right now.


such a throw away post,

yes you're here , yes the time is short, yes sparks will be lynched, what else?

All I'm trying to do is to stir up discussion because noone else is posting when we're only a few hours. Unless you'd rather me not say anything, ofcourse. 

My opinion is all there and has been presented further in the reply to Impertinance. However, aside from that there's not a lot more to say until we see what happens with Sparks and who dies tonight.



 

Here lies the dearly departed Nintendomination Thread.

Around the Network

If anyone want's me dead, they will probably have to shoot me twice.



Conegamer said:
Wonktonodi said:
Conegamer said:
Yeah, the day ends in just 7 hours. 7 hours!

It's time to sorta start posting rather than hanging back. I'm still up for Sparks; he seems like the safest bet right now.


such a throw away post,

yes you're here , yes the time is short, yes sparks will be lynched, what else?

All I'm trying to do is to stir up discussion because noone else is posting when we're only a few hours. Unless you'd rather me not say anything, ofcourse. 

My opinion is all there and has been presented further in the reply to Impertinance. However, aside from that there's not a lot more to say until we see what happens with Sparks and who dies tonight.

There is plenty more to say, you coment on the quiet, but didn't bother to coment on the things said.

I was alone in here for a while that didn't stop me from posting, from investigating and sharing conclusions.

What you said didn't encourage discussion, it just observered that there wasn't any.



impertinence said:
WhiteEaglePL said:
Wonktonodi said:

 

that reminds me

Unvote

Vote Sparks


Suddenly you want to vote him again.

White: Did you ever understand why Wonk moved his vote of Sparks and why some people were sayign that it was a good thing that Sparks wasn't lynched three days ago? If you are unsure about these things, ask someone! You will learn the game must faster if you ask about things that seem strange to you. Your post seems to indicate that you don't understand why Wonk removed his vote from Sparks, if that is the case you should make sure you understand exactly what happened and why it happened when Sparks was almost lynched. If you are town it is possible mafia is using your confusion to drive their agenda.


I just don't know why he voted again, the part where he stopped me from lynching Sparks I understand.



Conegamer.

Early in Day 1 you started an early bandwagon on NIcklesbe. The problem here is that you did it directly after TruckOSaurus and you were mimicing his (and others) reasoning. You added in that it was your gut feeling, and I see those gut feeling votes (especially with little to go with) as Scummy.

Not only was your early Nick bandwagon a bad thing (he already had enough pressure on him, so it wasnt a pressure vote), but your distinct lack of meaningful activity throughout the day was a cause for concern. Multiple posts here and here stated that you were going to either post thoughts on the 9th and 10th, while both promises of activity fell flat on their faces. Not only that, but you were 100% lying when asked about it, which could be seen my your activity on the site. You were lying and I dont like it when people lie in a game of Mafia.

Furthermore, you only managed to pull out a detailed post regarding your thoughts after being pressured with a vote.

-

Day 2

This post here rubs me the wrong way. It would be obvious to any Terran (Town) what the results were. You shouldnt need confirmation.

Said you will go into more detail "today" here, and once again did not deliver on your promise.

Seemingly agreed with me regarding WEPL's apparent Medic question and the confusion, then jumped straight on my arse when people started to question me and put HoS' on me.

-

All in all, a lot of empty promises, mimicing what other people say and generally it seems like you arent going out to find your own reasons to suspect people and are happy to bandwagon. You post a lot of nothingness and seem to pop up at coincidental times when youre either being pressured or when something tasty is kicking off.

I dont like it and Im half tempted to take my vote off Sparks.



                            

Around the Network
Wonktonodi said:

There is plenty more to say, you coment on the quiet, but didn't bother to coment on the things said.

I was alone in here for a while that didn't stop me from posting, from investigating and sharing conclusions.

What you said didn't encourage discussion, it just observered that there wasn't any.


Earlier when I said I have one more player in mind, it was Conegamer.

Id like your thoughts (and everyone elses) on my analysis.



                            

Carl2291 said:
Wonktonodi said:

There is plenty more to say, you coment on the quiet, but didn't bother to coment on the things said.

I was alone in here for a while that didn't stop me from posting, from investigating and sharing conclusions.

What you said didn't encourage discussion, it just observered that there wasn't any.


Earlier when I said I have one more player in mind, it was Conegamer.

Id like your thoughts (and everyone elses) on my analysis.

some of your points about activity are ones I find a little more forgivable, life happens outside this game, though better to not commit to something you can't do.

What I do agree with is his posts since then, like the one I just asked him about.

Plus why hasn't he ever done analysis on any other player. he tends to just agree with most analysis that other players pressent to him, or keep an eye out, instead of going back and looking himself.



Unvote

Vote Sparks


Now let's see if i get the reaction i'm looking for.



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

Carl2291 said:
Wonktonodi said:

There is plenty more to say, you coment on the quiet, but didn't bother to coment on the things said.

I was alone in here for a while that didn't stop me from posting, from investigating and sharing conclusions.

What you said didn't encourage discussion, it just observered that there wasn't any.


Earlier when I said I have one more player in mind, it was Conegamer.

Id like your thoughts (and everyone elses) on my analysis.

I agree with what you are saying (except that he agreed with your interpretation of WhiteEagle tryign to out the doc), but I also think this is pretty much the established case against Cone.

He is evasive and non comittal almost to the point of it being comical, but the biggest concern is whan he said he was inactive because of moving etc. A rudemantery knowledge of the rest of the forum is enough to confirm that he is never inactive. It's pretty clear to me that his behavior is by design rather than lack of time. 

That said, he could just be the type of player who is not very confident in their play. As this is his second ever mafia game I believe, he might be intimidated by the collecetion of more experienced players and is playing everything supersafe to not appear like he doesn;t get what is going on. If I remember right, he used a variation of that defence himself early on Day 1.

That said, he is very defensive about his play and almost always is very quick to defend himself. He often goes to the "what else do you want me to do?!?" defence.

I think he is quite possibly scum.



Mr Khan said:
Unvote

Vote Sparks


Now let's see if i get the reaction i'm looking for.


No. Vote Carl