By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Microsoft Mocks Sony With "Destiny Fragrance"

Aura7541 said:
jnemesh said:
Well, MS didn't decide to kill off the page themselves, so you judge for yourself how or why it happened.

Yeah, that's the fishy part. If the Destiny perfume ad was totally harmless, then why remove the page?

What I think is the ad was brought to the attention of MS lawyers, who calmly pointed out to the marketing department that the ad actually did encroach on the Destiny trademark, which MS has no right to use ("Desinty is an Epic new FPS game" = using Bungie's trademark, you can't trademark a word for all uses, but you can trademark a word when used in a partiuclar context, and Bungie will own a trademark over "Destiny" (esp with a capital D denoting it as a name) when used in reference to an FPS video game, no doubt.

So the good lawyerly advice would be, take that ad down, and before you try again come to us to clear the ad so that you can be sure there are not copyright or trademark infringements.

I'd be surprised if Sony or Acti-Bungie took any formal action. If anything there might have been an e-mail between the legal departments saying "Not cool guys". Sometimes things can be resolved in a cordial manner without going to court, esp when the "wrong doing" is clear and unambiguous.

No harm no foul.



“The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."

Jimi Hendrix

 

Around the Network

Wow I actually ate dinner while reading the post on here about this. Quite entertaining indeed. One thing I can say about VGChartz...we're never boring!



PSN ID- RayCrocheron82

XBL Gamertag- RAFIE82

NNID- RAFIE82/ Friend Code: SW-6006-2580-8237

YouTube- Rafie Crocheron

thismeintiel said:
prayformojo said:
thismeintiel said:
And Sony's only response will be the big gap between both versions of the games and the huge boost the game will be for PS4 sales.


Attach rates decide who the true winner is. If the PS4 version sells more copies because it has a higher user base but the Xbone version has a higher attach rate, that's more impressive for Xbone. 

Apples to apples and so forth. 


Sony will make massively more money from Destiny than MS will, in both SW and HW sales.  Apples to apples, you know.


not really.

if guys have to buy a fullprice copy without bundles, u make more money form the game

 

thats why sony make so much money with fifa

ms paid for exclusiv marketing and give it for free in bundles

sony got massive sales nevertheless

 

 

same applies to destiny.

if we talk about profits, it will be nearly the same

but its still a win for sony, because they finally got a big shooter associated first with the playstation brand

 

 

so no. massively more money is the whole wrong term

edit: that happend with watch dogs. but it will not for destiny. because we wont have a 2:1 ps4 to xb1 ratio. 

and if we add last gen too, it will be even more favour ms. wouldnt suprise me, if this game will sell nearly the same on xbox family like ps family



binary solo said:

What I think is the ad was brought to the attention of MS lawyers, who calmly pointed out to the marketing department that the ad actually did encroach on the Destiny trademark, which MS has no right to use ("Desinty is an Epic new FPS game" = using Bungie's trademark, you can't trademark a word for all uses, but you can trademark a word when used in a partiuclar context, and Bungie will own a trademark over "Destiny" (esp with a capital D denoting it as a name) when used in reference to an FPS video game, no doubt.

So the good lawyerly advice would be, take that ad down, and before you try again come to us to clear the ad so that you can be sure there are not copyright or trademark infringements.

I'd be surprised if Sony or Acti-Bungie took any formal action. If anything there might have been an e-mail between the legal departments saying "Not cool guys". Sometimes things can be resolved in a cordial manner without going to court, esp when the "wrong doing" is clear and unambiguous.

No harm no foul.

Ah, I see.I don't think Sony will sweat too much about this and the worst case scenario will only be a small slap to the wrist. After all, the fact that MS was trying to advertise eau de toilette Destiny was pretty funny, even for Sony



Rafie said:

Wow I actually ate dinner while reading the post on here about this. Quite entertaining indeed. One thing I can say about VGChartz...we're never boring!

You could make that the site's slogan xD



Around the Network
Mr_No said:
Rafie said:

Wow I actually ate dinner while reading the post on here about this. Quite entertaining indeed. One thing I can say about VGChartz...we're never boring!

You could make that the site's slogan xD


Hey you're on to something there! LOL Unfortunately I can't quite my day job. Hehe

 

Oh and that "taste like salt" post you posted a few pages back had me rolling! :D



PSN ID- RayCrocheron82

XBL Gamertag- RAFIE82

NNID- RAFIE82/ Friend Code: SW-6006-2580-8237

YouTube- Rafie Crocheron

Clever but how will MS respond if say Sony pulls out an Add for:

Join the Sony army. You are Being Called for Duty. Join Now!



prayformojo said:
Mr.Playstation said:
Microsoft being sore losers about losing again.


Lets be fair, buying the rights to give the illusion that a game is exclusive... that's lame and kind of pathetic. I know Microsoft does it too, and it's just as lame when they do it but it is, infact, lame. It's not like Sony was playing on level ground here to begin with. So, imo, the fact that MS did this is totally fair game. One company cheated, the other cheated back. I have no issue with it.

Yes, call me all the previous time Sony "dennounced" MS on this pratic...

I'll give you a freebie. Sony said in their Gamescon that all temporary exclusives would be announced as that, not pretending to be forever.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Ssenkahdavic said:
Clever but how will MS respond if say Sony pulls out an Add for:

Join the Sony army. You are Being Called for Duty. Join Now!


That would be clever and wouldn't use the trademark of the game... but even so they could be called in for the allusion...



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Maybe we can get a Call of Duty fragrance too.