By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 05 September 2014
Edit Thread
prayformojo said:
Mr.Playstation said:
Microsoft being sore losers about losing again.


Lets be fair, buying the rights to give the illusion that a game is exclusive... that's lame and kind of pathetic. I know Microsoft does it too, and it's just as lame when they do it but it is, infact, lame. It's not like Sony was playing on level ground here to begin with. So, imo, the fact that MS did this is totally fair game. One company cheated, the other cheated back. I have no issue with it.

Yes, call me all the previous time Sony "dennounced" MS on this pratic...

I'll give you a freebie. Sony said in their Gamescon that all temporary exclusives would be announced as that, not pretending to be forever.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."