By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Jrpg or Wrpg Which do you like more?

I strongly prefer WRPGs, mostly because they don't let silly things like story and character development get in the way of good, solid dungeon-crawling action. And in their best moments, WRPGs can even have both. (See: Baldur's Gate and its sequels.) It's just that there's so few of them nowadays, and half of them are either Diablo II clones or single-player MMOs. (See: The Witcher.)

Most JRPGs have horrible combat, horribly generic settings, and pad everything out with a bunch of trite dialog and characters that wouldn't fit up to the standards of your average pulp-fantasy novel, let alone a well-written game like Fallout or Baldur's Gate.



"'Casual games' are something the 'Game Industry' invented to explain away the Wii success instead of actually listening or looking at what Nintendo did. There is no 'casual strategy' from Nintendo. 'Accessible strategy', yes, but ‘casual gamers’ is just the 'Game Industry''s polite way of saying what they feel: 'retarded gamers'."

 -Sean Malstrom

 

 

Around the Network

JRPG like Pokémon.



JRPGs. WRPGs, while technically much more true Role Playing Games, don't really appeal to me. The extra 'freedom' just makes me lose interest quickly detracts from the story and character development. Also, while there are exceptions, too many WRPGs are still stuck in the D&D/LotR art style. Even those that aren't are usually artistically bland and aim for realism over style. The graphics may be good, but if it's not something I'm interested in looking at, that doesn't really matter.

The more straightforward story telling, creative art styles, and character development/relationships draw me to JRPGs. I also love the quirky humor found in many of them.

Either way, I really think the comparison is a little unfair. There are great games in both genres, but the bottom line is they really are two separate genres. It's really unfortunate that at some point way-back-when these two genres both got labeled "RPGs." It leads to so many discussions about which is better when there's really no reason to compare the two other than an arbitrary label. They're really not much more similar than platformers and FPS.



JRPG's for the win, but I have a lot of respect for WRPG's too. Diablo is my favorite game of all time.



We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers…Also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of beer, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls.  The only thing that really worried me was the ether.  There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge. –Raoul Duke

It is hard to shed anything but crocodile tears over White House speechwriter Patrick Buchanan's tragic analysis of the Nixon debacle. "It's like Sisyphus," he said. "We rolled the rock all the way up the mountain...and it rolled right back down on us...."  Neither Sisyphus nor the commander of the Light Brigade nor Pat Buchanan had the time or any real inclination to question what they were doing...a martyr, to the bitter end, to a "flawed" cause and a narrow, atavistic concept of conservative politics that has done more damage to itself and the country in less than six years than its liberal enemies could have done in two or three decades. -Hunter S. Thompson

WRPGs, because they tend to wrap up their grinds in exploration, making them far more palatable.

Also, Bioware's games tend to have better character development than just about any other RPG.



"The worst part about these reviews is they are [subjective]--and their scores often depend on how drunk you got the media at a Street Fighter event."  — Mona Hamilton, Capcom Senior VP of Marketing
*Image indefinitely borrowed from BrainBoxLtd without his consent.

Around the Network
famousringo said:
WRPGs, because they tend to wrap up their grinds in exploration, making them far more palatable.

Also, Bioware's games tend to have better character development than just about any other RPG.

 Thank you for reminding me exploration is why I love my rpgs. That is why wrpgs win but pokemon had some good exploration too. 



famousringo said:
WRPGs, because they tend to wrap up their grinds in exploration, making them far more palatable.

Also, Bioware's games tend to have better character development than just about any other RPG.

 This, definitely, on both counts. There's more character development in a single major BioWare character than in the entire cast of your average Final Fantasy game.



"'Casual games' are something the 'Game Industry' invented to explain away the Wii success instead of actually listening or looking at what Nintendo did. There is no 'casual strategy' from Nintendo. 'Accessible strategy', yes, but ‘casual gamers’ is just the 'Game Industry''s polite way of saying what they feel: 'retarded gamers'."

 -Sean Malstrom

 

 

WRPGs because i like being able to customize my character the way I want, name it the name i want it to have...not play a premade character and story



Lets See I really liked:

Quest for Glory1-3, Eye of The Beholder 1&2, Stonekeep, M&M Clouds of Xeen, Ultima Underworld, Bauldars Gate 1&2 + expansions,Planescape Torment, Betrayal at Krondor, Fallout 1&2, Icewind Dale, FFVII, Neverwinter Nights 1&2+ expansions, The Witcher, Mass Effect, Lost Oddesy

I also enjoyed to a lesser extent: Diablo 1&2, Morrowind, Oblivion, Dungen Siege

For me the games in bold had the strongest most compelling naratives. I typically prefer western RPG's



Wrpgs, the stories are better, they typically try to be slightly innovative and I don't have to spend half the game level grinding.