Outlaw. This is your chance to be a hero.

Do you have good feelings, townie leanings for anyone?

1. Lots of people have done that this game. Why don't you go after them, too?
2. Also lots of other inactive people.
3. You think mafia would admit they're banwagoning? They would try to rationalize their choices instead.
4. It happens all the time (talking about past games) and, as Smeags admitted, is not indicative of scum.
5. He didn't. He only pointed out how if prof says someone is town and they flip mafia, it'll look bad. and if prof says someone is scum and he flips town, it'll look bad. What RCT said is 100% true actually. Nothing scummy there.

That's some circular logic right there. You say we shouldn't talk about factions, you claim to be town, therefore if someone talks about factions they're not town because you say we shouldn't talk about factions?

Also, tell me how exactly someone can be on a multi-faction? You can't be on a multi-faction, multi-faction is a game setup, not a faction. Unless you're saying someone could belong to two factions at once? I suppose that's possible, but I doubt it.

If you want to talk about padibs claims, fine, but that doesn't mean we can't talk about factions too. It's not distracting the town, it's multitasking, something that I've been told I'm not good at, and admittedly I'm not. But I'll make an honest effort.

Padib claims to have a governor-like ability. If this claim is true, then outlawauron is safe, so it would be fine to vote him, but it would waste a night. If his claims are not true, they could be incorrect in many ways. There are too many variable for your test to work. Too many questions.

1. Does he actually have that power, or did he just happen to know about the mayor ability and thought it'd be worth risking claiming that role to get the heat off outlaw? If he doesn't have the power, he might just genuinely think outlaw is innocent and thought a really reckless bluff might work. If he does, then we waste a lynch and don't nail a mafia, merely confirm a town.

2. Is outlaw innocent? If he's not, and padib is lying, then we kill a mafia, and have reason to suspect padib is on outlaw's team. If he is, and I'm pretty sure he is, then we kill an innocent, and why would mafia lie to save an innocent? This would confirm padib to be town, thus failing to nail a mafia while at the same time killing an innocent.

3. Did padib actually use his power? Perhaps he wasn't lying about the power, but about whether he used it or not? This seems like the most likely situation to me, as lying about using the power would have the same effect on votes as actually using the power, but you retain the power to either back up your claim if necessary, but if it becomes no longer necessary, you can use the power later. Padib is experienced, so I feel like he'd see this. If we do this test of yours, and padib is lying about having used the power, he'll be forced to waste the power to back his credibility as town, thus wasting a town power and a lynch.

So to me, we run a lot of risks with this experiment. I'm hoping padib had the common sense not to actually use his power, in which case it would also be common sense to lie that he did. I won't press padib on this because it would not be in the interest of town to force him to reveal if he still has his power. You seem bent on forcing him to reveal whether or not he used his power, all on the off chance that he doesn't have the power in the first place, in which case we could still be killing a town.

Meanwhile, we have a good case on RCT. RCT has given a hint to his role, saying it involves self-protection. What role could involve that?

Most people I don't have reasons to have suspicion, but I believe conegamer is genuine.

Unvote: outlawauron

Is that, like, your speciality? Calling everyone smart, buttering them up so they'll agree with you? People are smart enough not to fall for that, or at least I'd hope.

D: Suicide

padib and prof the antagonizing of each other is leading us nowhere.

I'm leaving soon so I'm gonna leave these thoughts out:

@padib: Right now, if you're telling the truth and we don't test your claim, the only ones who get free information are the Mafia. They know you're town, the know you used your power, they know if you've prevented a mislynch or if you've saved one of their own, they also know you're powerless and so they'll come looking elsewhere when comes to the time to choose a murder victim.

If you let us test out your claim then we even the playing field a bit more since the town will also know you're telling the truth, Mafia won't be able to write you off as a potential victim since a confirmed townie as very troublesome for them but they'll be scared to kill you because of the fear of protection from a doctor.

So testing out your claim screw with the Mafia's head and gives the town much needed information.

Rct you do realize that by unvoting outlaw you are sentencing yourself to death?

Please put your vote back on outlaw. You say you don't like Day One, make sure you didn't go through it for nothing, you're so close to making it to Day Two, don't give up.