Dude you said "Mafia shouldn't be able to stop another m afias lynch" Remember semantics? Saying what you mean and meaning what you say..You said a mafia stopping another mafia's lynch. Not mafia stopping the towns lynch. That to me looks like a serious slip.

A fucking teammate u twits

nevermind prof I apologize. After reading trucks statement I get it now. I take it back.

Gotcha, gotcha. Indeed, even the article admits its a very powerful role for mafia. When do you think a mafia governor would use their ability?

And you know perfectly well what I'm talking about. Multiple people have discussed a second faction now. Stop trying to hide it, it just makes you look suspicious.

Multiple factions are a waste of time.
we have no evidence.
anyone talking about multiple factions right now has a good chance of either being on a multi faction or is mafia trying to distract the town.
go example: right now we should be talking about testing p adibs claims. Yet we are arguing over nothing.

So, this post is for others who can lend some wisdom.

Links are in the numbers.

1. Sparks says that he wants a vote from me, in order to confirm my support of "'town should vote' thing."
2. I tell him that that's not specifically what I stated, and that I was in support of town action over moving on to day two without action.
3. Sparks is then of the belief that, once again, my support of action can only be proved if I vote.
4. I, once again, tell him that if there is action reglardless of my vote, then the action still happened (!!!). And that this is, going back to my original post, a good thing if action happens over a long and active day one (which it has).
5. Sparks then goes off about how the original idea isn't mine (which I didn't argue. I can only speak for my own words...) and says how he wasn't clear about what he wanted from me.
6. So I ask him what he means.
7. Sparks says he wants a vote from me, in order to confirm my support of "'town should vote' thing." And now I'm flippy and scummy.

So from what I can see, this whole argument has gone completely circular. So...

Oh and about him being a liar.
if he's a liar he's definitely mafia.
its a convenient claim. It needs to be tested. If we test it now, he's almost confirmed town. That saves cop to investigate whoever and we dont really need to worry about him. I know it would answer a lot of questions that I have.
confirming a townie is much better than lynching someone.

No what we should be doing is making sure the most obvious mafia is voted for tonight. Outlaw is not that. RCT is. Now you can try to make a better argument why outlaw is worse, which I have yet to see any evidence of. Trying to test padibs claim is not a good enough reason and is frankly not really related to outlaw at all other than Padid saved him.  Trying to test Padibs claim would waste the day and give mafia the advantage. Is that what you want? We should be going after the person that is most likely Mafia and right now that is RCT.

Nothing wrong with continuing an investigation I've gotten this far with. I get what it means now, but I was referring to the earlier discussion about there being multiple mafia factions. Surely you read that much? It wasn't that far back I don't think. Some are doubting it, but it's not out of the question. I personally think there are precisely two factions. With 15 people and all of them having a power role, it makes sense to me that there'd be about 9 townies and two teams of 3 mafia. And don't sweep this under the rug like prof has been doing. He's already a little too thrilled to have you in the game, I don't want to have to suspect you this early. Call it tunnel vision if you like, it's not baseless, nor are my votes. As far as I'm concerned, there's nothing wrong with focusing my efforts. It's a little late to just throw everything I've got away because a couple of people think I should drop prof.

Now for some quick opinions about players:

noname: I like his input so far, I pretty much agree with everything in this post: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6569131

Hylian: To add to what noname said, I found his defense of outlaw to be disproportionate. Particularly in this post http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6565336 where he went as far as counting how many of his last 100 posts were quotes to defend him not starting conversations. I personally don't feel strongly about outlaw being town or Mafia at this point but I really don't look favorably on someone defending another player that strongly. Especially on Day One.

Wright: He's one of two things, either he's disappointed in what the game of Mafia is and he copes by being constantly off-topic and non helpful or he's scum who's acting that way to prevent from having to put forward anything worthwhile.

Cone: I didn't like his early play, somewhat better now but still unknown to me when it comes to alignment.

Mr Khan: When I was reading the thread as a mere bystander he was the first one that gave me a scummy vibe. First of all, he focused on flavor for a long time and most importantly, he jumped on the conegamer voting bandwagon like a lion who's finally found a prey.