Words Of Wisdom said: IkePoR has asked to be replaced. I am currently seeking a replacement for him. |
Trucks wants to play!
Words Of Wisdom said: IkePoR has asked to be replaced. I am currently seeking a replacement for him. |
Trucks wants to play!
theprof00 said: More importantly, Outlaw, Why shouldn't we lynch you? |
Well, because you have zero reason to lynch first of all. The mindset went from "action is better than non-action" (and I agree!) to "we take action for the sake of taking action" which has lead to some pretty hilariously bad statements and accusations. You spend too much time meta-gaming to see how silly some of it sounds.
@ padib
My finger of suspiscion is still on Wright. Not much that can convince he's worth lynching though.
outlawauron said:
Well, because you have zero reason to lynch first of all. The mindset went from "action is better than non-action" (and I agree!) to "we take action for the sake of taking action" which has lead to some pretty hilariously bad statements and accusations. You spend too much time meta-gaming to see how silly some of it sounds. @ padib My finger of suspiscion is still on Wright. Not much that can convince he's worth lynching though. |
Ok you've argued why we have no reason to vote you, but not why you shouldn't be lynched.
theprof00 said:
Ok you've argued why we have no reason to vote you, but not why you shouldn't be lynched. |
Isn't that the same thing? If you have no reason to vote for a person, then you shouldn't lynch them. That isn't what Prince Marth wants to build.
If you absolutely feel you do lynch someone, you pick who you believe to be scum or the least active. I don't think I fit the bill.
padib said:
The day will be ending soon. You might place your vote on prof to save your skin. If you do so, would you have a case against him? Otherwise, if you have a finger of suspicion on Wright, we only have so much time before the end of the day. It'll be important to build a case lest you're caught unsure who to vote for at the end of the day and we end up with a butchered townie. |
I'm going to wait for Prof's answer before I make any real action.
As far as building a case on Wright, he completely backed off his accusations on cone. He's been tight lipped on what made me suspcious int he first place.
outlawauron said:
Isn't that the same thing? If you have no reason to vote for a person, then you shouldn't lynch them. That isn't what Prince Marth wants to build. If you absolutely feel you do lynch someone, you pick who you believe to be scum or the least active. I don't think I fit the bill. |
hmmm not quite.
Just because you haven't given us a good reason to vote for you doesn't mean you're not mafia.
Unfortunately, you haven't given us a good reason NOT to vote for you.
outlawauron said:
I'm going to wait for Prof's answer before I make any real action. As far as building a case on Wright, he completely backed off his accusations on cone. He's been tight lipped on what made me suspcious int he first place. |
But that's not true at all
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6567302
Also
"There's nothing fake. My accusation still stands against Conegamer."
Those were his latest two posts.
theprof00 said:
hmmm not quite. Just because you haven't given us a good reason to vote for you doesn't mean you're not mafia. Unfortunately, you haven't given us a good reason NOT to vote for you. |
I'm going to avoid claiming any roles,etc. because it won't help me and is pretty useless tbh. Regardless of what I claim, it won't change your mind as you'll respond with a similar post as what I'm quoting. Bloodlust doesn't look too good on you prof.
theprof00 said:
But that's not true at all http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6567302 Also "There's nothing fake. My accusation still stands against Conegamer." Those were his latest two posts. |
Completely missed the first post, but the second comment means largely nothing. Just that his opinion hasn't changed.
padib said:
Do you think that Wright backing off of his accusations might be rooted in him just creating phony scenarios he doesn't actually believe in? I'm not sure I understand why prof's answers are important for you to investigate Wright, or did I understand that wrong? |
My first comment was a response to your post saying I should vote for prof to save my skin. Waiting for his answer was said because I wanted to have that convo before trying to build a case against him.