outlawauron said:
padib said:
outlawauron said:
theprof00 said: More importantly, Outlaw, Why shouldn't we lynch you? |
Well, because you have zero reason to lynch first of all. The mindset went from "action is better than non-action" (and I agree!) to "we take action for the sake of taking action" which has lead to some pretty hilariously bad statements and accusations. You spend too much time meta-gaming to see how silly some of it sounds.
@ padib
My finger of suspiscion is still on Wright. Not much that can convince he's worth lynching though.
|
The day will be ending soon. You might place your vote on prof to save your skin. If you do so, would you have a case against him?
Otherwise, if you have a finger of suspicion on Wright, we only have so much time before the end of the day. It'll be important to build a case lest you're caught unsure who to vote for at the end of the day and we end up with a butchered townie.
|
I'm going to wait for Prof's answer before I make any real action.
As far as building a case on Wright, he completely backed off his accusations on cone. He's been tight lipped on what made me suspcious int he first place.
|
But that's not true at all
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6567302
Also
"There's nothing fake. My accusation still stands against Conegamer."
Those were his latest two posts.