By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
outlawauron said:
padib said:
outlawauron said:
theprof00 said:
More importantly, Outlaw, Why shouldn't we lynch you?

Well, because you have zero reason to lynch first of all. The mindset went from "action is better than non-action" (and I agree!) to "we take action for the sake of taking action" which has lead to some pretty hilariously bad statements and accusations. You spend too much time meta-gaming to see how silly some of it sounds.

@ padib

My finger of suspiscion is still on Wright. Not much that can convince he's worth lynching though.

The day will be ending soon. You might place your vote on prof to save your skin. If you do so, would you have a case against him?

Otherwise, if you have a finger of suspicion on Wright, we only have so much time before the end of the day. It'll be important to build a case lest you're caught unsure who to vote for at the end of the day and we end up with a butchered townie.

I'm going to wait for Prof's answer before I make any real action.

As far as building a case on Wright, he completely backed off his accusations on cone. He's been tight lipped on what made me suspcious int he first place.

But that's not true at all

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6567302

Also

"There's nothing fake. My accusation still stands against Conegamer."

Those were his latest two posts.