By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Fire Emblem Mafia - Game Thread - Concluded

theprof00 said:

No, it was in the last 200-300 posts I think. It was something like "what about safeclaims, there must be a reason why they were given", etc.

Ctrl+F "Claim"

What I've found was Hylian accusing you of fakeclaiming.

And Nicklesbe saying that you parroted NoName by saying that characters don't matter because of fakeclaims. (2nd to last paragraph)



Around the Network
Person Voting To Lynch Identity

Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5  
Conegamer outlawauron          
HylianSwordsman theprof00          
IkePoR            
Mr. Khan theprof00          
Nicklesbe            
noname2200            
outlawauron            
padib WhiteEaglePL          
RCTjunkie outlawauron          
Smeags            
Sparks outlawauron          
spurgeonryan Conegamer          
theprof00 outlawauron          
WhiteEaglePL            
Wright Conegamer          
  With 15 alive, it takes 8 to lynch.  

32 hours until Night 1 - http://itsalmo.st/#night1

If the vote count is in error, please PM me!



theprof00 said:

Nickles:
Just a note, it's interesting that we used to have a player named nikells here. Always makes me think it's him, but it's not.

Seems excited to play. Confirms he's nervous. Makes his first accusation against cone, smeags, and sparks all working together. Not sure where he got this kind of insight. I ask him how he knows mafia might know each other. He says it was in the signups. Agrees that smeags is a pro. How did he know this? Anyhoo he says on the signups that mafia can only talk at night. After some talk about who can talk when yadda yadda he says i have poor reading comprehension, but that's figured out later on. Then there's the talk about actions

ugh

there's so much talk here I'm just going to skip it unless I see something interesting

One interesting thing so far, he thinks it takes 8 to lynch but the rules clearly say "the person with the most votes at the end". Is he trying to pretend like he doesn't know and wouldve partaken in a "woops" prof lynch? Hmmm

Thinks he will be murdered for some reason.

Also thinks that even if I'm mafia, I could cause a mafia to slip? Could you explain that Nickels? Just seems odd that I would try and trick a teammate (if I indeed know them...but like I said earlier, are we even sure they know each other?)

Hasn't shown up since I posted my statistical proof that he was wrong, which was about 23 hours ago. Not a suspicion, just pointing out that I'd like a response.

VERDICT: Slightly leaning town...maybe, 60%?
I have some questions that I'd like answered.
1. Why do you think you'll be murdered?
2. As a mafia, how could I be beneficial to town by getting a mafia to slip?
3. What do you think of my statistical analysis of people "clamming up"?

Before I thought it was a sure thing that he was town...but I'm not so sure now.

1. I still think its possibly, even likely but at the time I was confident in my accusations. I thought I had pretty solid proof, that and the fact that I felt I was being scapegoated earlier and figured if you couldn't vote me then you'd likely murder me. You pretty much sure you'd be murdered too, so doesn't that cast as much suspicion on you? Granted you could be a townie and you feel you are a target because you have been so aggressive, casting so many accusations in different directions, and so far a lot people are taking your lead, and you noted in your game history that you are often murdered. So you could b basing that off of experience or that information is simply a ruse and it's a narrative you want new players like me to follow so we don't suspect you for casting so much suspicion in so many directions, nearly distracting everyone, and being too aggressive.  

2, I hope you ask sparks and padib that question because it was a point they both made while trying to save you. I think You could give someone away if you are overly protective/defensive of them or vica versa. You could have a conversation with them that seems rehearsed or planned. You could agree too much or come off as overly united in decision making. Someone could have a conversation with you and let something slip/say/refer to something to you that was said in private. I don't know if they can talk yet but I think it would be a safe bet to assume they would sometime after day two since it's been night.

3. I think you did a fantastic job, and ultimately were right. It was my POV, but that doesn't mean what I thought was fact. I should have manned up and said so sooner because it was one of the things that really made me doubt my decision and take my vote off you. I didn't say anything sooner today because so far I've been busy doing other things since it's my day off. I also didn't really want to talk about it anymore, I felt it had been hashed out and I wanted to start focusing on other people and your interactions with other people. The other reason is I was wrong, way wrong again and I was prideful and embarrassed.



http://www.youtube.com/v/AoOOpLpcF28 http://www.youtube.com/v/CphFZGH5030

All Hail the Jester King. The King is back, and I am still a dirty girl prof ;)

padib said:
theprof00 said:
@hylian
change my style? Fucking brilliant mate. Clearly a mind without match.
how come I hadn't thought about that before.
look, here's some semantics. I said ALL I EVER GET is one night because seriously no matter what all I ever get is one or two nights. If im too quiet I get killed, if im aggressive I get killed, if I joke I get killed.
Its just what happens you Brainiac. This is the only way I get to play.
I can't believe you just grab me advice on how to play, how fucking egotistical are you?

Hard headed, know it all, egocentric, illogical. And I'm the threat to town?

This isn't profia, it's mafia.

He's right, the game ends up revolving around you.

Mafia isn't about you. Your statistics about how everyone starts posting thanks to you are highly flawed, pesonally I hadn't even started playing until much later when you and others had already done most of the posting. Sure, I'll follow and respond to what I read. It doesn't mean I would not have posted otherwise had others posted instead of you.

You may have tried changing your playstyle before, try it again. You are not the smartest tool in the shed, and the more you convince yourself of that, the more you will cause yourself and the others problems in the game. You can last later in the game, just try playing differently. If you've tried before, try again - only differently. Keep trying. Some of the best players I've seen on mafiascum last later in the game because they play more intelligently than you.

@Hylian
I apologize for calling you an egomaniac. This one is the real deal.

The game ends up revolving around me because I put in the most effort. I LOVE this game. Others don't. It shows.

Lol challenging the statistics. OK. I mean sure there's margin for error, but the answer is pretty clear that you talked about things because there were things available to be talked about. Half your contributions are directly related to me and another half toward people I'm questioning.



Nicklesbe said:

3. I think you did a fantastic job, and ultimately were right. It was my POV, but that doesn't mean what I thought was fact. I should have manned up and said so sooner because it was one of the things that really made me doubt my decision and take my vote off you. I didn't say anything sooner today because so far I've been busy doing other things since it's my day off. I also didn't really want to talk about it anymore, I felt it had been hashed out and I wanted to start focusing on other people and your interactions with other people. The other reason is I was wrong, way wrong again and I was prideful and embarrassed.

This is the difference between townie and mafia.

I'd say you're up to 75% town from 60%

A mafia doesn't typically think that way.



Around the Network
theprof00 said:

 

The game ends up revolving around me because I put in the most effort. I LOVE this game. Others don't. It shows.

I doubt anyone can argue this much.

And whatever, it's fine, I made more a fool of myself than you did of me, I'm over myself now.



padib said:

So you're saying who doesn't like this game exactly? If you're ready to make a statement like that, you should be clear about who you're referring to.

You're awesome and you make everyone around you love this game too.

I will mostly ignore you from now on as the last thing I want is to be accused of piggybacking on your ineffective semantic traps.

I said LOVE not like. It's funny that you think I focus too much on semantics. You don't seem to care at all what the meanings of words are.

(this is not an accusation)



More importantly, Outlaw, Why shouldn't we lynch you?



IkePoR has asked to be replaced. I am currently seeking a replacement for him.



Smeags said:
theprof00 said:

No, it was in the last 200-300 posts I think. It was something like "what about safeclaims, there must be a reason why they were given", etc.

Ctrl+F "Claim"

What I've found was Hylian accusing you of fakeclaiming.

And Nicklesbe saying that you parroted NoName by saying that characters don't matter because of fakeclaims. (2nd to last paragraph)

Nah none of those turned out to be it. Maybe I dreamed it.

*Shrugs*