Fire Emblem Mafia - Game Thread - Concluded

[Nicklesbe]

theprof00 said:

Nickles:
Just a note, it's interesting that we used to have a player named nikells here. Always makes me think it's him, but it's not.

Seems excited to play. Confirms he's nervous. Makes his first accusation against cone, smeags, and sparks all working together. Not sure where he got this kind of insight. I ask him how he knows mafia might know each other. He says it was in the signups. Agrees that smeags is a pro. How did he know this? Anyhoo he says on the signups that mafia can only talk at night. After some talk about who can talk when yadda yadda he says i have poor reading comprehension, but that's figured out later on. Then there's the talk about actions

ugh

there's so much talk here I'm just going to skip it unless I see something interesting

One interesting thing so far, he thinks it takes 8 to lynch but the rules clearly say "the person with the most votes at the end". Is he trying to pretend like he doesn't know and wouldve partaken in a "woops" prof lynch? Hmmm

Thinks he will be murdered for some reason.

Also thinks that even if I'm mafia, I could cause a mafia to slip? Could you explain that Nickels? Just seems odd that I would try and trick a teammate (if I indeed know them...but like I said earlier, are we even sure they know each other?)

Hasn't shown up since I posted my statistical proof that he was wrong, which was about 23 hours ago. Not a suspicion, just pointing out that I'd like a response.

VERDICT: Slightly leaning town...maybe, 60%?
I have some questions that I'd like answered.
1. Why do you think you'll be murdered?
2. As a mafia, how could I be beneficial to town by getting a mafia to slip?
3. What do you think of my statistical analysis of people "clamming up"?

Before I thought it was a sure thing that he was town...but I'm not so sure now.

1. I still think its possibly, even likely but at the time I was confident in my accusations. I thought I had pretty solid proof, that and the fact that I felt I was being scapegoated earlier and figured if you couldn't vote me then you'd likely murder me. You pretty much sure you'd be murdered too, so doesn't that cast as much suspicion on you? Granted you could be a townie and you feel you are a target because you have been so aggressive, casting so many accusations in different directions, and so far a lot people are taking your lead, and you noted in your game history that you are often murdered. So you could b basing that off of experience or that information is simply a ruse and it's a narrative you want new players like me to follow so we don't suspect you for casting so much suspicion in so many directions, nearly distracting everyone, and being too aggressive.  

2, I hope you ask sparks and padib that question because it was a point they both made while trying to save you. I think You could give someone away if you are overly protective/defensive of them or vica versa. You could have a conversation with them that seems rehearsed or planned. You could agree too much or come off as overly united in decision making. Someone could have a conversation with you and let something slip/say/refer to something to you that was said in private. I don't know if they can talk yet but I think it would be a safe bet to assume they would sometime after day two since it's been night.

3. I think you did a fantastic job, and ultimately were right. It was my POV, but that doesn't mean what I thought was fact. I should have manned up and said so sooner because it was one of the things that really made me doubt my decision and take my vote off you. I didn't say anything sooner today because so far I've been busy doing other things since it's my day off. I also didn't really want to talk about it anymore, I felt it had been hashed out and I wanted to start focusing on other people and your interactions with other people. The other reason is I was wrong, way wrong again and I was prideful and embarrassed.