Sparks said:
|
Conegamer said:
Yes, I saw what you said. Just because a couple of people have voted for me it doesn't mean it becomes a one-on-one, particularly on the first day. If there's other people who you believe are more suspicious, why not vote for them? Surely you have reasons to vote for them, right? Perhaps you could provide them.
|
I already gave many reasons for the people I suspect; IkePoR, RCTjunkie, outlawauron, and to a much lesser extent Khan, you, and Smeags. But it didn't work. I also asked people who are currently voting for prof to reconsider, but that didn't work either.
Now I have to think practically, and try for the least amount of losses. I can't let town hand prof's head to the mafia on a silver platter (our best townie), not even wasting their kill for the night, and leaving them free to get more people.
I trust prof frequents the thread enough to save himself in time before nightfall if need be.
Having said all that, I think I have one last chance to sway one person, since I only just read his post, and he seems to have misunderstood QUITE a lot of things.
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6562258
I'm busy IRL at the moment, though, so it will have to wait. Have fun in the meantime ; )
|
That is fine, you raise some good points.
At any rate, may as well make my vote now and explain a little now with a more in-depth explanation tomorrow or later today. I vote Outlawauron.
Why? A few reasons. It is mainly due to the responses in the thread of which he has made thus far. First let's have a look at Smeags' and now also TheProf's comparisons (there's more from both of these users, but you get the idea). Both of them reflect the same thing; Outlaw is the only person whose contributions appear to have gone backwards as time went by. Now, that's unusual because more and more accusations have been thrown out and things have got more serious, so a lack of discussion and content appears to me to be an evasive move.
Then you have comments like this one, where he effectively tries to find a reason to not respond to questions which is something that doesn't make sense to me. Indeed, as time went on his opinion and his contributions seemed to boil down further to a point where they were unrelated to the game, as he seemed to almost fall behind a false persona thereafter and make more general comments. To me, this strikes as a man who is trying to remain in the shadows and banking on an earlier flurry of activity (which upon reflection seems rather canned and pre-planned, as others picked up on sooner but my lack of experience took longer to pick up on) to protect himself when we get to the serious part of the day. Again, this reflects back to what was mentioned before.
Wright still unnerves me somewhat. But, I've spoken to him enough on and off the site to know that this is just his style, at least that's what I'm thinking for now. It's why I wanted to wait for more information but theprof's comparison saved me looking through it tomorrow morning, so it just tipped it in his favour enough to make my decision.
As I said I'll go into more depth when I have more time. But Outlaw seems to be trying his best to just tip-toe his way around and has made a few slip-ups which are unbecoming of him. So, out of everything I've seen thus far, I'm going to have to accuse him.
