Lol I haven't even written down the case and you're already freaking out.

I'm not freaking out I'm pissed off, and there is a distinct difference. i've seen to many fellow townies killed this game because of bad logic and ignoring evidence. So yeah I'm pissed because you would rather try to pile flimsy nonevidence against me instead of looking at white and just writing him off. Especially since there is no logical reason why a town would act that way. Lets look at the brief history of this game so far, you ignored evidence and you trusted White and it lead to the deaths of Cone and sparks. So yeah I'm angry because I'm seeing history repeat itself and this time it will either be game over or you start day 5 without a tracker and white will have a 3rd kill under his belt.

You best not question almighty prof.

Everybody cries everybody begs.

ain't gonna cry or beg. Maybe some .gif responses.

boom

Ok so I got bored and wrote it up. Here ya go.

Names abbreviated to O for outlaw MK for mr khan, N for nickles.
Name qName means they quoted them.

O looking at you sparky
N defends himself @ team knowing each other Fos Prof
N thought chatting @ night was an action
N- people who accuse the most are mafia, asks deduction quesiton; How does being new and saying things show slips
O- People who are inactive should be punished
MK goes after Cone over flavor reasons
N argues with prof
O I have no idea what's going on with that argument
MK- the back and forth is confusing. Prof is casuing discord
N- Prof makes people clam up. Doesn't agree with khans vote for prof. Prof is lyig manipulating, obfuscating, but not fos or hos worthy
N qSparks I beolieve Prof is mafia. I understand vote for outlaw but seems unsubstatiated
N qProf I'm looking at everyone, but I won't remove my vote on Prof yet
N- people clam up around prof
O thread needs kantor
MK qProf the case against you is evidenced by the votes against you
O- my contributions are increasing according to the stats
O- Cone and Wright are working togheter>?
N qSparksProf case was based on slips. Still causing chaos. I understand the Outlaw vote but still unconvinced.
N asks everyone a bunch of questions. Mass text.
O qProf You have no reason to lynch me
O in padib discussion, backs off Wright a bit
O- RCT is major suspect, not a noob. Has a reason to side with prof
MK- I could be persuaded to change vote, but not to outlaw
O- Sparks and Prof might be distancing?
O qRCT Please explain your vote for outlaw (himself)
MK vote cone. for suspicious activity. Prof is confusing. How is cone clearly town?
N -I understand suspicion f outlaw for inactivity. Outlaws low activity is suspect but after Padibs pressing that's been alleviated. Looks to RCT andWright. I suspect also Prof, because when MK voted prof, prof voted him back.
N- what is everyone's thoughts on RCT? Vote RCT after padib blabs his role. Adds "preventing analysis" to RCT's crimes.
N qSparks I tried to get input from everyone. Outlaw is my second choice but the surge in activity (from padib) changed that. I can't vote for outlaw now.

end of page 1

rest to come tomorrow