O looking at you sparky
N defends himself @ team knowing each other Fos Prof
N thought chatting @ night was an action
N- people who accuse the most are mafia, asks deduction quesiton; How does being new and saying things show slips
O- People who are inactive should be punished
MK goes after Cone over flavor reasons
N argues with prof
O I have no idea what's going on with that argument
MK- the back and forth is confusing. Prof is casuing discord
N- Prof makes people clam up. Doesn't agree with khans vote for prof. Prof is lyig manipulating, obfuscating, but not fos or hos worthy
N qSparks I beolieve Prof is mafia. I understand vote for outlaw but seems unsubstatiated
N qProf I'm looking at everyone, but I won't remove my vote on Prof yet
N- people clam up around prof
O thread needs kantor
MK qProf the case against you is evidenced by the votes against you
O- my contributions are increasing according to the stats
O- Cone and Wright are working togheter>?
N qSparksProf case was based on slips. Still causing chaos. I understand the Outlaw vote but still unconvinced.
N asks everyone a bunch of questions. Mass text.
O qProf You have no reason to lynch me
O in padib discussion, backs off Wright a bit
O- RCT is major suspect, not a noob. Has a reason to side with prof
MK- I could be persuaded to change vote, but not to outlaw
O- Sparks and Prof might be distancing?
O qRCT Please explain your vote for outlaw (himself)
MK vote cone. for suspicious activity. Prof is confusing. How is cone clearly town?
N -I understand suspicion f outlaw for inactivity. Outlaws low activity is suspect but after Padibs pressing that's been alleviated. Looks to RCT andWright. I suspect also Prof, because when MK voted prof, prof voted him back.
N- what is everyone's thoughts on RCT? Vote RCT after padib blabs his role. Adds "preventing analysis" to RCT's crimes.
N qSparks I tried to get input from everyone. Outlaw is my second choice but the surge in activity (from padib) changed that. I can't vote for outlaw now.
end of page 1
