I answer in riddles becaue it's fun and I don't like how you play. Same reason for wasting your time.

For the whole team comment, you fail realize I never indicated an alignment. That's why I wanted to know what you were because it would give me an idea of what the others were.

I've never changed my opinion about you not being vanilla. I just didn't voice that opinion because I had no reason to do so.

I never said cone or WE were scum, I said one of the two trackers are scum. That would be WE or Nickle. Once again, the debate yesterday was cone vs sparks.

Once again, I'm never outright said you were lying, I just don't completely believe you. This is exactly why I didn't want to mention this because you miss the forest for the trees. You've wasted so much time here.

So you admit to purposely wasting my time by not answering what you're asked because you think it's fun and you don't like my style?

And then you say IM the one wasting time.....hmmm

I fail to notice you never indicated alignment? Yet in a post immediately previous you said "I don't want to post for two reasons: potential death and it would be unfair to the other people if I was correct. I know what it's like to have people against with zero actual reason, let alone hard evidence."

This is just too sad to continue. It's like watching an beast trying to wriggle free of a trap and just hurting itself in the process.

vote: outlaw

ALSO special award goes to Padib for preventing a mafia from being lynched on the very first day. Clearly this is a new record in Padib's storied mafia legacy.

They might be town, but they're not clearly town. Someone pointed out earlier that RCT has been pretty absent and only shows up once enough people call him out, and IkePoR has nothing to his posts. Smeag's last count had Ike at 14 posts with just 2 contributions. Are you flipflopping because you changed your mind about them? Perhaps, but maybe you are, as I was, simply changing your mind. I didn't initially suspect them, but then I did. I changed my mind. Not enough to vote for them, but enough to suspect them. You made some arguments about them, and while you never voted for them, you did suspect them at one point. You debated about it for a good bit before finally deciding on outlawauron, then continued to pursue people even though you'd already voted, and have yet to change your vote. I debated about it for a shorter bit before deciding on you, then continued to pursue people, at least until you kept bugging me about it, and I have yet to change my vote. The differences I see here is that I decided slightly sooner nevermind you decided on me before I ever decided on anyone and then switched to outlaw a short time later, and that I was questioned primarily by the person I voted for, who was butthurt about being voted for, while you were questioned primarily by people who voted for you. We're both contributing similarly, but my contributions are mostly being ignored because everyone is following you. The more I think about it the more I think you guys might be on a team. Nickles is the only other person following you, and he's a flip-flopping noob like myself.

Of note, one of the contributions of mine that was ignored was my post about how outlawauron always posts like this, even outside this thread. If you disagree on the relevancy of that, feel free to say so, but thus far no one has mentioned that. Why? Because they're all following you, and as that contribution is from me, and you decided I'm irrational and manipulative, no one is going to consider it, whether it has any merit to it or not. Seriously, does anyone other than Conegamer, RTC, Sparks, theprof, or anyone that voted for theprof have anything to say about outlawauron? I know a few other people suspect him, but is outlawauron really our only suspect? Spurge, Wright, why did you vote Cone? Why are you not voting outlaw? I've said my piece on the matter, Khan has said he's not convinced, Nickles is flip-flopping, and though I think padib said something about it, I forget what that was.

Note to self: Sticking to your guts on the first day is apparently on the "Do" list in the Mafia 101 book and on the "Don't" list for the Town 101 book. My bad.

Other note to self: Flip-flopping must be backed by scientific research or it's manipulation. Sorry, I just can't be bothered to comb through every post to do this, guess I'm screwed.

Mafia Day talk:

That assumption is false. Mafia can only talk at night as confirmed by WoW. It is possible that some roles can talk during the day (possibly lovers where if one dies the other also dies), but that can't be confirmed by WoW and reasonably so. These lovers could be of same alignment or of different alignment.

Interesting, so lovers can be on opposite sides? If that were the case, killing one would kill at least one mafia, so probably best to get such couples sooner than later, while we still have numbers on our side. Numbers matter very much for town, as losing them would mean an instant mafia win. That said, I don't think any lovers of this sort are in the game, as being lovers on opposite sides would mean you could just reveal your game card, get mod killed, and thereby kill your lover to help your team. On the other hand, siblings, as described in that article, are more interesting. Town siblings would probably have no problem blending in, as I said before, while mafia siblings would have to be very careful not to seem together. If you're right and there are lovers in this game, they're probably on the same side, and if we notice them, they're probably mafia.

I feel like I'm being ignored here right now lolz. :(