By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Fire Emblem Mafia - Game Thread - Concluded

theprof00 on 27 August 2014

Oh and you implied that I have a role, and that WE was lying about tracking me because that would mean I was at home doing nothing if he's telling the truth.



Around the Network
outlawauron on 27 August 2014
theprof00 said:
outlawauron said:

Because we had two opposing forces and I thought that they had to be both on opposite sides. Clearly I was wrong.

Were you wrong? Because immediately today you said you sinceerely doubted that WE tracked me. Yesterday, you believed that either cone or WE was scum.
Today you show up expecting WE to actually be the tracker. Then you say he's a liar. Now you say above "clearly I was wrong". Which is it? Do you believe or not believe WE?

I'm talking about being wrong on the previous day, nothing to do with today. (cone vs. sparks)

As far as WE, I don't completely trust him as stated above.



"We'll toss the dice however they fall,
And snuggle the girls be they short or tall,
Then follow young Mat whenever he calls,
To dance with Jak o' the Shadows."

Check out MyAnimeList and my Game Collection. Owner of the 5 millionth post.

WhiteEaglePL on 27 August 2014
WhiteEaglePL said:
I'm Shiida and I have a Pegasus btw - just to help defend myself against an unnecessary lynch of me.



I feel like I'm being ignored here right now lolz. :(



theprof00 on 27 August 2014
outlawauron said:
theprof00 said:
Here's what I gather from your posts outlaw:
You didn't like rct for changing his vote.
You only once posted a suspect list. It was these 4 people: Rct, Cone, Sparks and Prof
You debated the "no vanilla rule"
You claim to be Barst, who is a fighter. I am also a fighter. I am vanilla.
You say that I'm someone to "watch", but that I'm not the best target. You're implying watcher.
You wonder where I was last night. Implying you watched someone and saw me there.
You hope WE followed me, implying you watched me and saw noone there.
You say you sincerely doubt WE followed me last night.

You certainly implied a lot of things outlaw.
And you haven't done much to find mafia, including today, where your main suspect is a townie who was attacked by the only killing faction on the first day.

I underlined the correct things and I'll bold what I didn't mean to communicate.

For the last thing, I'm not completely buying WE because how odd he is playing. It's possible that's just his play style/experience, but if he were mafia, then he would be told to continue acting silly and not change. So, I definitely think it's possibility. 

I also didn't say you were my main suspect, just that I thought you had a team building around you. 

I don't believe you. It looks to me like you tried to set either me or White Eagle up today.
You answer in riddles.
You made me reread the thread several times to see your stupid vanilla claim. Wasting my time.
Your theory of my team involves ANOTHER confirmed townie scanned by the cop.
You don't believe I'm a vanilla because you're vanilla and "It's [a] possibility but a low one with the limited amount of people left", implying that the possibility is somehow now different than when the game started.
You said either cone or WE was scum. Then you come in today saying you hope WE tracked me, and doubting that I'm vanilla. Then you call WE a liar. Then you call me a liar. 



theprof00 on 27 August 2014

I have every right to vote for you right now outlaw. Your story is a mess, and your logic is extremely unsound.



Around the Network
WhiteEaglePL on 27 August 2014
theprof00 said:
I have every right to vote for you right now outlaw. Your story is a mess, and your logic is extremely unsound.

...

 

I'll just come back once everyone rereads all of the last 2 pages or so. XD



theprof00 on 27 August 2014
padib said:
@Hylian. I'm starting to think there are lovers in this game and we need to be really careful who we vote for.

Why did you say this?



outlawauron on 27 August 2014
theprof00 said:
outlawauron said:
theprof00 said:
Here's what I gather from your posts outlaw:
You didn't like rct for changing his vote.
You only once posted a suspect list. It was these 4 people: Rct, Cone, Sparks and Prof
You debated the "no vanilla rule"
You claim to be Barst, who is a fighter. I am also a fighter. I am vanilla.
You say that I'm someone to "watch", but that I'm not the best target. You're implying watcher.
You wonder where I was last night. Implying you watched someone and saw me there.
You hope WE followed me, implying you watched me and saw noone there.
You say you sincerely doubt WE followed me last night.

You certainly implied a lot of things outlaw.
And you haven't done much to find mafia, including today, where your main suspect is a townie who was attacked by the only killing faction on the first day.

I underlined the correct things and I'll bold what I didn't mean to communicate.

For the last thing, I'm not completely buying WE because how odd he is playing. It's possible that's just his play style/experience, but if he were mafia, then he would be told to continue acting silly and not change. So, I definitely think it's possibility. 

I also didn't say you were my main suspect, just that I thought you had a team building around you. 

I don't believe you. It looks to me like you tried to set either me or White Eagle up today.
You answer in riddles.
You made me reread the thread several times to see your stupid vanilla claim. Wasting my time.
Your theory of my team involves ANOTHER confirmed townie scanned by the cop.
You don't believe I'm a vanilla because you're vanilla and "It's [a] possibility but a low one with the limited amount of people left", implying that the possibility is somehow now different than when the game started.
You said either cone or WE was scum. Then you come in today saying you hope WE tracked me, and doubting that I'm vanilla. Then you call WE a liar. Then you call me a liar. 

I answer in riddles becaue it's fun and I don't like how you play. Same reason for wasting your time.

For the whole team comment, you fail realize I never indicated an alignment. That's why I wanted to know what you were because it would give me an idea of what the others were.

I've never changed my opinion about you not being vanilla. I just didn't voice that opinion because I had no reason to do so.

I never said cone or WE were scum, I said one of the two trackers are scum. That would be WE or Nickle. Once again, the debate yesterday was cone vs sparks.

Once again, I'm never outright said you were lying, I just don't completely believe you. This is exactly why I didn't want to mention this because you miss the forest for the trees. You've wasted so much time here.



"We'll toss the dice however they fall,
And snuggle the girls be they short or tall,
Then follow young Mat whenever he calls,
To dance with Jak o' the Shadows."

Check out MyAnimeList and my Game Collection. Owner of the 5 millionth post.

outlawauron on 27 August 2014

Prof, I even said it was a gut feeling. I don't vote on my gut like you (and so many others) have.

If you bring up my day 1 vote, it was just a troll vote because I thought I was going to die.



"We'll toss the dice however they fall,
And snuggle the girls be they short or tall,
Then follow young Mat whenever he calls,
To dance with Jak o' the Shadows."

Check out MyAnimeList and my Game Collection. Owner of the 5 millionth post.

WhiteEaglePL on 27 August 2014

Noone cares about who my character is.