By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
outlawauron said:
theprof00 said:
Here's what I gather from your posts outlaw:
You didn't like rct for changing his vote.
You only once posted a suspect list. It was these 4 people: Rct, Cone, Sparks and Prof
You debated the "no vanilla rule"
You claim to be Barst, who is a fighter. I am also a fighter. I am vanilla.
You say that I'm someone to "watch", but that I'm not the best target. You're implying watcher.
You wonder where I was last night. Implying you watched someone and saw me there.
You hope WE followed me, implying you watched me and saw noone there.
You say you sincerely doubt WE followed me last night.

You certainly implied a lot of things outlaw.
And you haven't done much to find mafia, including today, where your main suspect is a townie who was attacked by the only killing faction on the first day.

I underlined the correct things and I'll bold what I didn't mean to communicate.

For the last thing, I'm not completely buying WE because how odd he is playing. It's possible that's just his play style/experience, but if he were mafia, then he would be told to continue acting silly and not change. So, I definitely think it's possibility. 

I also didn't say you were my main suspect, just that I thought you had a team building around you. 

I don't believe you. It looks to me like you tried to set either me or White Eagle up today.
You answer in riddles.
You made me reread the thread several times to see your stupid vanilla claim. Wasting my time.
Your theory of my team involves ANOTHER confirmed townie scanned by the cop.
You don't believe I'm a vanilla because you're vanilla and "It's [a] possibility but a low one with the limited amount of people left", implying that the possibility is somehow now different than when the game started.
You said either cone or WE was scum. Then you come in today saying you hope WE tracked me, and doubting that I'm vanilla. Then you call WE a liar. Then you call me a liar.