Nicklesbe said:
outlawauron said: (sorry the thread fell off my buddy)
So, I think it's much more reasonable to believe that there's a serial killer/vigilante than two mafia groups. Do we agree on that? |
Perhaps. I don't know enough yet to know for sure either way. I am curious tho if in this instance the killer/vigilante has limited shots as trucks eluded to then why would someone waste one on someone that claimed they had a bullet proof vest? is there a chance they don't have limited shots? I would figure they would want to make the shot count if it was limited. Unless of course the killer/vigilante went after theprof and killed spurge instead and the mafia went after RCT? However that makes me wonder why the mafia would waste a kill on someone with so much suspicion, so little contributions, and a claim that he had a bullet proof vest?
|
Now see, as opposed to padib's superficial praise, THESE are actually good questions.
Why would a vig target RCT? Well, we don't even know if this actually happened, but to extrapolate on what trucks said: Mafia would unlikely target a claimed bulletproof because they'd probably believe him, whereas town would try anyway thinking that he was a lying mafia. Again, that's IF this actually happened.
The killer/vig coming after me makes no sense. An sk/killer/vig would want to go after mafia first, to whittle them down. There were very few reasons to target me. Unless the killer is an imbecile. Mafia had lots of reasons to kill me. A secondary killer would have had none.
Good beginning questions, only need the experience to tie them together.