They should have offered an unlocked frame rate, at least on the PS4, I would like to see what the real rate it, how close to 60 could it be? :-S

Fluctuating framerate with an online-shooter? Who would want this?!

Yep. Exactly what I was saying in that same thread. I had played both PS4 and X1 Beta on my SAME TV, switched inputs at the SAME scenes and there was NO crushed blacks.. the differences looked NOTHING like the screen caps in the OP. I said the same thing that the PS4 had a little more detail, and the X1 was a little fuzzy. But since it was 1080p native vs 900p that wasn't surprising.   There was almost no differences between the 2.. specially NONE that would be seen during the fast pace play of the game. I had to look closely at each one to find the small level of better detail on the PS4.

Now.. the PS3 BETA.. OMG..  It is SOOOO bad. The game looks like it was made 3-4 years ago on the PS3.   

I know you were there and saw how almost no one cared for your experience :)

I think if they could have achived that then they would of went for it. They know the PS4 ver is gonna be there money maker why would they intentionally gimp it?

I am guessing this will be the theme for this generation, most multiplats will be equal, differences will be in exclusive content and first party titles.

I guess there will be more differences in resolution, shadows or whatever just because of better ressources. Not a big deal as it doesn't change the game itself (yeah, pros here can snipe better in 1080p, don't know how the played shooters on PS3, though) but there will be differences.

Good news. I hope more multiplats are more like Destiny so we don't have to keep hearing about inferior multiplats on X1.

COD:Ghosts was also a "not great looking cross gen title". So why in one we have a 125% pixel discrepancy and the other we have almost identical IQ?

So they opted to not have 60 fps? :(