By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Sony is looking at remastering PS3 titles the same way Disney remasters movies

Hynad on 17 July 2014
KLXVER said:
Hynad said:

A shit ton? Must not have played the same game. Tweaks to controls aren't "added stuff". A gamepad map and interface aren't "added stuff". They're tweaks.

They added Tingle Bottles, a Hero Mode, a Bloom filter... The rest are minimal additions at best, or part of the Wii U experience as a whole (miiverse integration). The small details do make the game better and more streamlined. But they're far from being the "shit ton" that you boast about. 

Once The Last of Us Remastered finally comes out, if we count every single tiny details the way people did for Wind Waker HD, I'm sure it will be comparable.

For one, the game is also getting a new difficulty level, just like Wind Waker HD did with its Hero Mode. 


You really cant see the difference between remastering a 10 year old SD game to a 1 year old HD game...?


Nope. I already explained to you that what matters is the demand for such remaster. Not the age of its original.

And when people ask you why the age of the original is important, the only answer you spout is "because, it's only one year old!" -__-



Around the Network
KLXVER on 17 July 2014
Hynad said:


Nope. I already explained to you that what matters is the demand for a product. Not its age.


Who made these demands?



DrDoomz on 17 July 2014
KLXVER said:
DrDoomz said:

You still haven't shown where the "taking advantage of" is happening, tho.... How does any of that convert to Sony "taking advantage" of anyone?


Ive explained that. Its on a previous page.

Looked thru our discussion.  Did't find where you stated a definitive argument proving some kind of "taking advantage" is happening. I apologize if I missed it. But can you quote the exact post pls?



KLXVER on 17 July 2014
Hynad said:

BC would also have made the console more expensive. Nintendo gets away with it because they don't aim the same technical advancements. They've been recycling the Gamecube architecture for 2 generations now. And it certainly shows.


The WiiU is not much different from a GC?



Hynad on 17 July 2014
KLXVER said:
Hynad said:


Nope. I already explained to you that what matters is the demand for a product. Not its age.


Who made these demands?


Were you under a rock when the game released? A lot of people wondered why they didn't keep that game for the PS4's launch. The same as Gran Turismo 6 and Beyond Two Souls.



Around the Network
RubberWhistleHistle on 17 July 2014
FATALITY said:
R


i hate to talk about those things with people like you, who clearly doesnt what his talking about.

sony as a whole its not doing pretty well. although according to forbes sony has profit this year of 1b http://www.forbes.com/companies/sony/

and for what its worth Sony is 10 times bigger than nintendo, and if you think that MS can afford burn money you are delusional

but this is not what im talking about

ps division is in better shape than xbox and nintendo.

yes, ps4 is more profitable than xbone and wii u.. but that isnt what i said now is it?

and thats interesting, how the bigger company has less money than the smaller company? lol. presents an interesting problem.



KLXVER on 17 July 2014
DrDoomz said:
KLXVER said:
DrDoomz said:

You still haven't shown where the "taking advantage of" is happening, tho.... How does any of that convert to Sony "taking advantage" of anyone?


Ive explained that. Its on a previous page.

Looked thru our discussion.  Did't find where you stated a definitive argument proving some kind of "taking advantage" is happening. I apologize if I missed it. But can you quote the exact post pls?

 

KLXVER said:
DrDoomz said:


How is this "taking advantage"? Please enlighten me.


Well theyre taking advantage of the people who own the game and the DLC on the PS3. Instead of giving people who own the PS3 game a discount, they sell it for 50$ no matter how much you have spent on it.

People who have downloaded the game on the PS3 cant even transfer it to the PS4.

They are not giving people who already own the game any advantages.


Hynad on 17 July 2014
KLXVER said:
Hynad said:

BC would also have made the console more expensive. Nintendo gets away with it because they don't aim the same technical advancements. They've been recycling the Gamecube architecture for 2 generations now. And it certainly shows.


The WiiU is not much different from a GC?

They both share the same hardware DNA. That's why backward compatibility is so easy to achieve. The same cannot be said with the PS4. Which went from a PPC based CPU (PS3's Cell), to the much demanded [by developers] x86.



KLXVER on 17 July 2014
Hynad said:


Were you under a rock when the game released? A lot of people wondered why they didn't keep that game for the PS4's launch. The same as Gran Turismo 6 and Beyond Two Souls.


People wondering why they didnt release it on the PS4 instead of the PS3 is not a demand for it to be released on both.



DrDoomz on 17 July 2014

And I explained. Not giving ppl who bought a title any advantage isn't "taking advantage" of anyone. Like buying a blu ray and then getting the collector's edition doesn't entitle you to a discount.