The industry we have now had kim Kardashian making games that sell. Sony did what they did, nintendo, did what it did, and microsoft did what it did. Competition changed the intdustry not one company. 

Not what I said though, is it?

I would like to add another point. Many are saying Nintendo innovated most in 7th gen. Nope. They didn't innovated anything in 7th gen. They stole Philips's idea about motion control.

I would say:

Atarii/Arcades Created it.

Nintendo Saved it.

SEGA Contributed.

Sony Changed it.

Microsoft Changed it more.

Future? Who knows!

You people really need to stop fighting over it look your damage controlling, calling everything from each other absolute garbage, and even making quote trees 5 times longer than the limit the forums rules has!
seriously we all have our views but doesnt mean people have to destroy him. Now I'm not trying to take sizes because both are being illogical imo.

Next time I register in gaming forum I will make sure that posting stupid things is against the site rules so that this kind of threads/posts get immediately deleted.

In that case, you dont have a point of worth.

For the record, after sleeping in on it I realize that I made a mistake in my classification of the Wii's market. In reality, we can't know if is gamer, non-gamer, hardcore, etc. even with the market increase and even if we have a general idea that casuals are who picked up the Wii, because that is still subjective.
Furthermore, It presents a problem when I introduce the PS1.
So from this point further, I've changed it.

The PS1 and PS2 introduced a new market that supplanted the old, one where focus on 3rd parties and broadened demographics became more important. Sure other companies did, but since this discussion is limited to how it affects the big 3 today, those companies are irrelevant. Because PlayStation changed the market for traditional home consoles, it became incompatible with Nintendo. This is mostly due that as a game developer themselves, Nintendo controlled other 3rd parties to maintain dominance. Since PS opened the doors on 3rd parties that approach has certainly backfired, and Nintendo's 3rd party support has been dwindling ever since, peaking with the GameCube. In the 4 generations, competing against PlayStation in the industry, console failings notwithstanding, the Wii was the only one that was first because it address a new market in the same way that the PS1 originally did. However, unlike the PS2, it has yet to capitalize on that market in 8th generation despite an uncontested year lead.
Since I can't describe the demographic of the Wii's marketshare, its erroneous to say that they moved on to mobile devices, but I can say that the popularity of mobile gaming may be affecting home consoles and are certainly affecting the industry as a whole, shifting focus there. but that is all I can say.

While its early, its obvious that thus far they have not solidified this market, if they can, and so trying to compete within PS market as before is obviously not going to work for Nintendo.

That's true, if you lack comprehension. 

I think this is all a very tricky topic. and its really hard to pin point who had the most influence into shaping the industry into what it is today. But its possible though.

I still stand by sony being responsible for what and where the industry is today and that its not MS. Here's why. Even after the NES and the SNES and having Sega on board to the 3rd and 4th gen of consoles didnt do anything to change the way the world looked at gaming or how the business of consoles was conducted. In the 5th gen when sony came in they changed all that.

Its common knowlege that sony came into the industry at a time when console gaming was still generally referred to as a toy. This was at a time when Microsoft clearly came out and said they would never make a console and how consoles as a business doesn't make sense. In the very same way that not very at sony even supported the idea of making a console. Its easy to look back and say MS did this and did that, but MS wouldn't even have come into the industry if not for the success of PS1. Once they came in, they simply did what MS would do based on their roots and expertise and thats why we got a well thought out OS and connected service. Thats not saying they didnt do anything great, just that even that feat can be attributed to sony.

Nintendo on the other hand, they are still doing exactly what they were always doing post Playstation era, still extremely resistant to any kinda significant change, still somehow managing to have a mostly traditional console in this day and age down to a limited 3rd party support. And that is why they are where they are today.