https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p3G-kTCMoAc

I was talking about this. 

I don't mind other strategies, as long as they don't damage fellow gamers. The more money you put into a project the more polished it will be or it will be finished sooner. As long as you invest it wisely of course. 

Just throwing money at something, doesn't necessarily  mean anything.  If all their workers are working on a project, more money is just wasteful.  And no, the more money also doesn't necessarily translate to more polish.  More time, translates to a more polished product.

As far as DLC, if you can convince gamer's to start voting with their wallets, you may get somewhere.  Until then, it's a waste of breath.  It won't change, and will likely only get worse.

Now I am beginning to think you are a sony hater and not just a facts hater. You think the reason games aren't realeased sooner is due to not investing more? And you can comfortably say this being a nintendo fan???????? Thats just a bottle of contradictions. ZeldaU? Look at it this way, one of sony's biggest franchises Uncharted. is coming out in 2015. two years after the ps4 launched. Zelda is coming out at 2015 at best, 3 years after the wiiU was launched. I gues by your logic nintendo should also invest more in their firts party. so the games come sooner.

just so you know, in the ps4's first year, 2 of its big franchises have already been released and one more is on the way. thats not even including driveclub which is a new IP. by the end of 2015, driveclub, infamous, killzone, the order, uncharted 4, bloodborne, knack would all have been released on the ps4. after just two years. and 4 of those games are new ips. So I don't really get what your point is. 

And i think you hvae not read my posts. I never aid timed dlc is right. whoever it is that does it. 

That's alright. I thought it would never come to Xbox.

I know, but I'll still complain about it when it happens, no matter which company does it. If Nintendo does it, I'll be the first to complain... Or cheer... That a third party is supporting the Wii U in the first place. :D

Gamer's need to realize that their complaints amount to jack and shit, unless it impacts a company financially.  I mean, I'm sure you understand this, but you're basically fuming at something that is, at this point, completely up to us to accept or refuse.  It's that simple.  Can't be angry at companies for trying to make money, but you can sure as shit be disgusted with gamer's who help prove to them that such practices represent a viable and profitable revenue stream.

Like I've said, you can't just throw more money and people at a project and expect to get done faster, there're always things that can go wrong during the development of games and it's always unfortunate but saying that Sony is not investing enough in first party projects seems very naive to me.

Also not every first party game is automatically everybodies cup of tea, so there is absolutely nothing wrong with wanting some exclusive content on a multiplat game you really enjoy over some first party title that you maybe aren't interested in.

Gaming tastes vary and it's a simple fact that most PS and Xbox owners are there for some multiplats, so I find it a bit ignorant to say that Sony shouldn't invest in making some of those third party games best on their platforms.

And I'm sure that Destiny will sell more than any first party title of any of the big 3 this year and that it will get most of its sales on PS platforms and that it'll sell a ton of PS4s, so I'd wager that more people are probably interested in getting the best "Destiny experience" than any of the original content that the big three produce this year.

Creating studios takes time and involves huge risks, why do you think Nintendo hasn't been doing any of this with all its billions in the last couple years (which is btw something you should ask yourself, if you have a problem with Sony investing in timed DLC, do you also have a problem with Nintendo just having its money sit there and do nothing with it?)? Why do you think MS has its new studio Black Tusk work on an already established and very big IP, just like 343i is? It's to reduce risk. Same with the timed DLC stuff, way smaller investments that are alot less riskier and are probably just as effective (if not more) as one new game in 3 years from a newly founded studio or something.