| Samus Aran said: People buy PS based on hype, not based on the games that are currently available. I never said Sony didn't invest in first-party games, I said they should invest MORE, so they can release their games sooner. Just because MS did it as well doesn't make it a good thing. They're both wrong, timed DLC sucks. |
Now I am beginning to think you are a sony hater and not just a facts hater. You think the reason games aren't realeased sooner is due to not investing more? And you can comfortably say this being a nintendo fan???????? Thats just a bottle of contradictions. ZeldaU? Look at it this way, one of sony's biggest franchises Uncharted. is coming out in 2015. two years after the ps4 launched. Zelda is coming out at 2015 at best, 3 years after the wiiU was launched. I gues by your logic nintendo should also invest more in their firts party. so the games come sooner.
just so you know, in the ps4's first year, 2 of its big franchises have already been released and one more is on the way. thats not even including driveclub which is a new IP. by the end of 2015, driveclub, infamous, killzone, the order, uncharted 4, bloodborne, knack would all have been released on the ps4. after just two years. and 4 of those games are new ips. So I don't really get what your point is.
And i think you hvae not read my posts. I never aid timed dlc is right. whoever it is that does it.
