By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DerNebel on 20 June 2014
Edit Thread
Samus Aran said:
DerNebel said:
Samus Aran said:

Sony is investing money in timed DLC while it should in my opinion invest in their own game line-up... Which isn't all that great. 

I'm glad Nintendo is behind the curve in third-party relations if you accept BS like this. 

How is Sony not investing in their own game line-up? Are their first party studios not working on games for the PS4? You realize that you can't just throw more people at a project and expect it to automatically be done faster, right? Since you're a Nintendo fan I want to remind you again, do you remember how many Wii U games Nintendo has already delayed?

And yeah I accept "BS" like this, I accept it because I know that I also benefit from it, as I for example in 95% of the cases don't have to worry if a third party game is even going to hit my platform of choice.

All the money they invest in timed DLC could be invested in their own projects. That's factual.

Good for you that you prefer timed DLC over Sony's first-party line-up. I just don't. 

They need to invest MORE in their first-party line-up. I never said they didn't invest in it lol. 

Like I've said, you can't just throw more money and people at a project and expect to get done faster, there're always things that can go wrong during the development of games and it's always unfortunate but saying that Sony is not investing enough in first party projects seems very naive to me.

Also not every first party game is automatically everybodies cup of tea, so there is absolutely nothing wrong with wanting some exclusive content on a multiplat game you really enjoy over some first party title that you maybe aren't interested in.

Gaming tastes vary and it's a simple fact that most PS and Xbox owners are there for some multiplats, so I find it a bit ignorant to say that Sony shouldn't invest in making some of those third party games best on their platforms.