No, thank you.
What are your thoughts on early access/paid alphas coming to PSN? | |||
| Good idea | 19 | 38.78% | |
| Bad idea | 16 | 32.65% | |
| Don't care | 6 | 12.24% | |
| 50/50 | 5 | 10.20% | |
| See Results | 2 | 4.08% | |
| Total: | 48 | ||
| Raziel123 said: 50/50. Steam has pretty much no QC and that's why it's become what it is PSN doesn't have to become that, Sony just needs to be a lot more demanding about what gets in, and It'd be okay |
If games like MAG or the Orange Box made it on PS3 what does that say about Sony's QC ?
The main difference is that Steam doesn't renew it's catalog through a "generational leap" that allows to start again from scratch.
fighter said:
|
Nothing?
| think-man said: I hate steam because you have to sift to shit to find anything decent, I hope PSN doesn't take that path. Interesting about the Vita though I didn't know they had dev kits, I'm going to look into that this weekend. Id love to fiddie around with the Vita. |
Funny because the way you "sift" through the catalog on Steam is so much more efficient than on consoles :
many more filters
detailed user reviews/advice and display of their actual usage in number of hours
links to metacritics
links to the afferent community forums
etc.
I hope consoles follow Steam's way of "sifting" through catalogs, but instead it seems they prefer the "know less" approach to compulsive purchasing.
Unless they have better quality control than Steam no thanks.
Sigs are dumb. And so are you!
Raziel123 said:
Nothing? |
I wouldn't go to that extreme, Sony still has some quality control.
| Fusioncode said: Unless they have better quality control than Steam no thanks. |
this
Just because YOU aren't interested in an entirely OPTIONAL service doesn't mean OTHERS aren't.
Just because YOU don't want something doesn't make it a bad idea.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
