By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - What is your stance on piracy?

I don't believe in piracy. If you can't afford to buy it, wait until you can. You will enjoy that much more when you do. Companies make games to make money, without the money many games would not be made. Anybody that thinks that games like Halo, MGS, FF, Mario, etc. were made only because of passion are full of BS... These were made by passionate people that had a great idea and wanted to share and make money off the idea.

As for discontinued stuff... I can see the logic. But, personally I don't agree and therefore don't do it.



Around the Network

"Yeah, if by some miracle pirating suddenly stopped and became impossible would anyone really believe those people would sit at home with no games, movies, or music and just twiddle their thumbs?

Of course not, they would actually go buy those games they're pirating."

Game over!



01000110 01101111 01110010 00100000 01001001 01111001 01101111 01101100 01100001 01101000 00100001 00100000 01000110 01101111 01110010 00100000 01000101 01110100 01100101 01110010 01101110 01101001 01110100 01111001 00100001 00100000

madkiller said:
 

Don't call me lazy and cheap. I own hundreds of games, movies AND CDs. However, I don't buy CDs anymore and I only buy DVDs that on sale or really cheap. I buy ALL my games, I don't pirate those at all. Also, I have NEVER shared anything over the internet with anyone else ever. I have also never made any money off of someone elses work. I do believe that CDs are not worth anywhere near what the companies charge and refuse to buy those anymore. Also, movies are not worth $20+ either, so I buy them only when they are cheap. I always prefer to have the original of anything, but I am not rich and cannot afford everything I would want to have so I download stuff sometimes, but I still spend thousands on the real products. Do not lump me in with the guys that spend all their time pirating.

However, I still think it is naive to believe that those billion dollar companies are really losing any money to pirating. I definitely don't feel bad for pirating something here and there, those companies are NOT hurting at all.


I mean "you" collectively, and I'm just pointing out your first sentence which too many people use.

You missed my edit at the end:

"Again I'll say, I download movies sometimes, but I don't try to justify it with crap arguments like that. It's not, "I would never buy The Professional, so I downloaded it this week and watched it,"
it's, "I don't want to buy The Professional, and I'm not going to buy it now or any time soon, I'd rather just download it." So that's what I did...and that's one less The Professional sale."

I download movies probably about once every 2 months...and they're typically movies between theater release and DVD release...that dead zone where you cannot watch the movie, but I missed it or want to show it to friends, etc.

I don't really care about a few movies and some music downloads. But your first "justification" is what uber-pirates use and it's stupid. I use Netflix, I buy a few CDs, and all my games...I can't stand people who pirate damn near everything, that's all. You're (general again) not that poor.



LEFT4DEAD411.COM
Bet with disolitude: Left4Dead will have a higher Metacritic rating than Project Origin, 3 months after the second game's release.  (hasn't been 3 months but it looks like I won :-p )

My personal opinion. Pirating sucks.

Pirated things feel shallow.

On other people pirating?

Hard to say. People pretend it's cut and dry one way or the other but it isn't. Studies on the effects of piracy vary. Most legitamite studies seems to suggest it's neither helps nor hurts sales, as for most people having more songs to listen to means you listen to more music which means you buy more cds.

Most people aren't wired "well if I can download all these CDs then i'll just download them and not buy any" for some reason. Most of the people who are like that seem to be the people that didn't buy CDs anyway.

Games may or may not be different considering you need much less of them to get by. The average person only needs one every couple months. Of course the people pirating aren't exactly the average person.

Microsoft seems to think piracy is a helpful marketing tool however, as their official company line is "don't pirate, but if you do pirate, pirate our stuff and not our competitors stuff."

Then you've got general economic realities, where some people live, where a video game or computer game would cost more then they make in a couple months... so it's not a case of people being cheap so much as not being able to afford it.

So, like most things. It's not a broad "It's good" or "It's bad" thing. It's something that varies from person to person. To me it seems likely that as a worldwide phenom is likely not harming anything though. As like it's been shown with music that piracy can actually create customers because some people just won't give things a shot because price is a barrier preventing them from trying something they may or may not like.

I mean how many people actually bought a Paint Shop program or something similar without actually trying it on a school or buisness computer first? (or pirated copy.)  Generally piracy tends to hurt the "bigger" guys and help the smaller guys in music.  I wonder if the trend follows elsewhere.

 



madkiller said:
 

 

However, I still think it is naive to believe that those billion dollar companies are really losing any money to pirating. I definitely don't feel bad for pirating something here and there, those companies are NOT hurting at all.


 I can't say anything about the music or movie industry but the budget on games are very tight.  Like I said: game developers don't live rockstar lives.  Even the leads make as much as a good programmer/engineer. 

Making games is in fact all about making money (that's how you define a successful game) but you don't get into making games to make a lot of money.  Like I said, my fiance makes about 2/3 in an entry level job more than I make.  Granted level designers are generally paid less than artists and programmers, but still none of those disciplines are in it for the money.



Around the Network

it is very bad



I'm with the people that think it's fine as long as it's out of print. I actually usually try to buy older, out of print games off ebay and such though. Even if it's not supporting the industry, I like having the actual packaging and stuff, and it'll in many cases at least support a gamer who might spend that money on other games (and spare them from taking it in the ass selling games at EB/Gamestop). However, sometimes ebay prices are down right criminal. Some rare games sell for $200+. I'd feel more guilty paying such absurd prices than I would pirating the game in those cases.

As for my feeling about people pirating available stuff, I'm pretty neutral. While there are certainly people that have the money and would buy a game if piracy weren't an option, the idea that every copy downloaded is a sale lost is absurd. It doesn't make it right or justify it in anyway, but if there was no chance of the person buying the game anyway, it's not all that damaging to the industry and is a pretty minor offense imo.

Of course there are people that simply look at it as a way to get things for free regardless of their financial ability to make the purchase. I have absolutely no love for these people and this is a serious problem. However, in my personal experiences, I think this type of pirate is much rarer than the industry leads people to believe. I've known plenty of people with modded consoles and stuff(especially in college), and all of them did buy games as their budgets permitted.



twesterm said:
madkiller said:
 

 

However, I still think it is naive to believe that those billion dollar companies are really losing any money to pirating. I definitely don't feel bad for pirating something here and there, those companies are NOT hurting at all.


 I can't say anything about the music or movie industry but the budget on games are very tight.  Like I said: game developers don't live rockstar lives.  Even the leads make as much as a good programmer/engineer. 

Making games is in fact all about making money (that's how you define a successful game) but you don't get into making games to make a lot of money.  Like I said, my fiance makes about 2/3 in an entry level job more than I make.  Granted level designers are generally paid less than artists and programmers, but still none of those disciplines are in it for the money.


I am talking about pirating in general, which is much bigger in movies and music than it is in games. Movies and music require nothing much to be done, while pirating games requires hardware mods. Plus, I already said that games deserve to be purchased more than movies and music. Games are not really overpriced (not as much anyway), but movies and music are way overpriced. Lower the prices, give those spoiled celebrities less money, then you will sell more copies...



"If you don't like me, bite me!"

Pirating games is dumb, it can be so difficult and in the end is usually easier to just buy the game.

Pirating movies, and tv shows and what not, isn't as bad, I mean paying $50-$100 for ONE season of a TV show, thats ridiculous, and then after paying $10 to go see a movie in theaters and then another $20-$30 to get it months later on disc, seems like a rip off.



Piracy is stealing, that's all. There is no difference between downloading a movie and stealing someone's property.