I guess. The TPS formula is super-perfected by now, so expecting big changes might be asking for too much.

I hope they bring something new to the table with U4 too.

That has nothing to do with rose-tinted glasses (I only ever owned two of the games I listed anyway and didn't get a PS2 in 2001 but later). The PS2s 2001 was leaps and bounds ahead of the PS4s 2014. In 2001 the PS2 got a whole lot of games that in that year could only be played on PS2 and that are to this day still considered some of the best games of all time, most of what I see for the PS4 on the horizon in 2014 (and don't get me wrong I like PS consoles and I want a PS4) are games that are multiplat, crossgen and are being predicted to disappoint left and right already.

The one that seems to be wearing rose-tinted glasses is you.

I'm sure it will be much better than this year, but I'd rather just re-enter when I'm sure the constant stream of games will be there. That should be certain for 2016, maybe late 2015. 

I refuse to believe they just have Driveclub and some b rated franchise (Ratchet?) planned for the rest of this year. I am always hearing about how many first party studios Sony has, but if all they can put out in the first year (which includes launch and two holidays) Is Killzone, Knack, Infamous, Driveclub, something else possibly and ports ... what the hell are they doing ....?

I don't think ports will cut it either, especially such recent ones, everyone just bought TLOU, why would you want to buy it again so soon? Same as GOW:A

Those who didnt buy the game will be interested, those who really loved the game and didnt buy the DLC could be interested too.

Playing TLOU in 1080p/60fps with gameplay as good as cinematic, it could worth the price.

5 first party games the first year to polish the others is good, dont think the 2 competitors can do half of that : i remind you Sony supported the PS3 until the end with a good bunch of first party exclusives, still they managed to bring more first party exclusives than microsoft. If they didnt support the PS3 and the Vita ( yes, Japan Studio has several teams on it) , they would have much more games on PS4. But since they stopped only recently the PS3 support, you can wait a lot of games coming in a near futur

Was it the same guy? No, therefore you have no point.

edit: Ratchet, a b-rated franchise? LoL. "I just love VGC".

Er except they have???? Both Nintendo and Microsoft I believe? NSMB, Nintendoland, Zelda Remake, 3D Mario, Wonderful 101 and more I'm porbably forgetting. MS will have Sunset Overdrive, Forza 5, Halo Collection, Forza Horizon, Kinect Sports Rivals, Killer Instinct, Ryse and other smaller retail titles.

It confuses me too. With their work force, PS4 development being easier, and Yoshida confirming all of their studios are working on PS4 games, I would expect better than what we have confirmed so far. History shows that SONY doesn't really wait for E3 to inform us of new games. Maybe that's changed or something.

Who knows what's going on inside their minds. They clearly did not expect (did anybody?) the PS4 to be this sucessful, they might be having doubts on how to proceed, strategically, after this "surprise". And maybe decided that staying silent until they figure it out would be wise. Whether it is a good choice or not is another matter. EIther way we'll see at E3 and the following months.

It's not honest to put unnannouced games when you dont know yet those for Sony.
You show me they have not , i fixed your list with retail  games made by first party studio because that's what we were talking about : First party studios capacity.

+ you completely ignored my point about sony support for their other consoles, sony are the only one supporting their consoles until the end, still, their competitor barely achieved the same level of first party support for their new console first year.

So i dont know what do you find strange ? They can do more than compete in first party terms against the 2 others  whereas they had to support 2 other consoles.