seriously though, this could be nintendos way out on the wiiu and can pave the way to launch their next console without "abandoning" the base.
| LiquorandGunFun said: seriously though, this could be nintendos way out on the wiiu and can pave the way to launch their next console without "abandoning" the base. |
They could also be fined for infringing philip's patents. Besides, they are selling the Wii U at a profit now.
Phillips should put a ban on itself. Wrap your head around that one fellas.
These companies, or patent trolls, should have to pay all court fees and lawyer fees for the company they sue if they lose the case. This seems seriously pathetic. Nintendo has won a lot of these stupid cases, and has spent millions defending themselves over the same shit time and again. The loser pays for everything.
| Justagamer said: These companies, or patent trolls, should have to pay all court fees and lawyer fees for the company they sue if they lose the case. This seems seriously pathetic. Nintendo has won a lot of these stupid cases, and has spent millions defending themselves over the same shit time and again. The loser pays for everything. |
Sometimes the court may order the losing side to pay for the winning sides attorney fees as well. In other countries like the UK, the losing side always has to pay for the winning sides fees. So in this case, if Philips has sued Nintendo in Europe, then they may have to pay Nitendo for the costs they incurred if they lose.
| TheLegendaryWolf said: "This is a civil action for infringement of a patent arising under the laws of the United States relating to patents, including 35 U.S.C. § 281 (…) Prayer for Relief WHEREFORE, Philips respectfully requests that judgment be entered: A. declaring that the Defendants have infringed the ’379 and ’231 patents; B. declaring that the Defendants’ infringement of the ’379 and ’231 patents has been deliberate and willful; C. compensating Philips for all damages caused by the Defendants’ infringement of the ’379 and ’231 patents; D. enhancing Philips’s damages up to three times their amount pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284; E. preliminarily and permanently enjoining the Defendants, their officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and those persons in active concert or participation with them, from making, using, selling, offering for sale, and importing within the United States interactive virtual modeling products and HCI products; F. granting Philips pre- and post-judgment interest on its damages, together with all costs and expenses; G. granting Philips its reasonable attorney fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285; and H. awarding such other relief as this Court may deem just and proper Demand for Jury Trial Plaintiff respectfully requests a trial by jury on all claims so triable." "We’re also hearing that the second patent mentions a wireless device that can be controlled via a secondary device through motion input. Philips is ultimately seeking damages and a Wii U sales ban." |
Quoting your OP directly to point out that Philips collaborated with them to create the Wii U Fit Meter. Nintendo might be using some of the wireless technology from the Fit Meter in their NFC figurines/QoL stuff.
I predict NX launches in 2017 - not 2016
MoHasanie said:
Sometimes the court may order the losing side to pay for the winning sides attorney fees as well. In other countries like the UK, the losing side always has to pay for the winning sides fees. So in this case, if Philips has sued Nintendo in Europe, then they may have to pay Nitendo for the costs they incurred if they lose. |
That's good. I didn't know that. I am ignorant about anything lawsuit/court related. But, that seems to me to be more than fair. I like your mario kart avatar, I can't wait for that game!
It's all over the news here in Belgium, Holland as well i think (Philips is a dutch company). Looks like they have a strong case against Nintendo, but don't worry guys. They are not going to really ban the Wii, WiiU and the other products. They just want some hefty royalties, which they will get since they've had the patents in question since 1996.
Phillips is going to be like, "hey, we're just saying that about the sales ban, we just want some royalties," but Nintendo is going to be all like, "no way, you guys are in the right and we respect the law so we'll stop making the Wii U immediately. Gosh darn it!"
The Nintendo brain-trust is probably giving each other high-fives as we speak.

ahahahahahahahaha
Proud to be the first cool Nintendo fan ever
Number ONE Zelda fan in the Universe
Prediction: No Zelda HD for Wii U, quietly moved to the succesor
Predictions for Nintendo NX and Mobile

