Yeah but not 1 million vs 9 million

okay, 500k vs. 3 million.

LOL

Better my  friend. Deal sealed.

Sony adapted to the world without free online gaming in the west as Microsoft has manipulated it. Right or wrong I knew I had to give up complaining about it because Microsoft won that decsion and Sony made their decsions based on where people put their money. Microsoft adapted to the fact that they couldn't control PC gamers with paid online, but adapted to the fact that they could control them if they control the hub of community gaming, which is the Xbox. Sony learned that free wont get them anywhere in this competitive climate that Microsoft had ushered the gaming industry into from the PC realm. Footing the bill for online became the peoples problems rather than the third parties who make the game.

'I can predict Microsoft, because they are predictable. Sony is a company that you WE KNOW internally can handle itself, but we do not know what they will put out for better or worse. It doesn't matter if you're into their games or not. Microsoft has proven time and time again and even media outlets have spoken out about their weak internal conceptual and development process that they've had since joining the console industry in 2000/2001. They will continue to be weak until they create companies who can build games on their own.

Sony evolves internally and continues to create. Their methods of survival during the PS3 era differed highly from the PS2 era because they realized the third parties were not going to be enough to fend them off from Microsoft who was going to try to level the playing field. Microsoft tends to mostly buy out other peoples stuff, so that leads them to hinder internal growth. They can buy as many companies as they want, but either those companies put up or shut up and in fifteen good years of being in the industry (soon) they are still only as good as a less than a handful. This is why Microsoft paid Double Helix to handle Killer Instinct. This is why Microsoft pays Capcom for their Dead Rising game. This is why Microsoft pays to get the constant edge on Sony instead of doing it themselves. If they had the ability and creativity, their future would be less predictable than even Sony whom has put out numerous amounts of products for better or worse. I say its about time Sony started looking outward like MS like they are doing now and filling in gaps with third party as well.

Microsoft knows that the first impression is the best one, which is why you see such a massive amount of games being laid on the table from other people. Microsoft knows that people mostly by consoles for third parties, so they picked and chose from the third parties. Its Sony who has to adapt to Microsoft and everytime they do they get stronger as a creative entity. All Microsoft had to do to Sony from the start was take third party exclusivity from them to level the playing field for the 360's generation.

Not that I am judging the op.For some reason I think this was done intentionally.Either that or what you said earlier the op does not know how forums work.

well said i know a lot of people don't realize how nonsensical that statement was xD

Found this after 3 seconds of looking.  

http://ps4daily.com/2013/06/sony-changed-playstation-4-drm-policy-after-xbox-one-outrage/

this is after one minute of looking 

http://www.edge-online.com/news/e3-2013-drm-free-ps4-is-a-pr-play-expect-similar-policies-across-both-consoles-say-sources/

So now we have Edge a respected media outlet and PS4daily.com a sony fanboy website saying the same thing...  

Sony exclusives being piss poor is not an opinion.  There have been major complaints with every exclusive so far...  I don't actually think theres a single exclusive yet that Sony can hang their hat on and say "this is why you want a PS4."  Their best game scores at the low 80s on metacritic.Hell, the highest rated games are ones that no one even cares enough to mention.    

http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4

Everything at the top is either borrowed from other platforms or indie.  With the exception of an MMO you can get on the PC and a baseball game.  I wouldn't call either of those system sellers.  Especially since you a hardcore Sony fan don't care enough to mention the PS4's best games, why should I count them.  

Those three quotes of mine don't have a factual statement in them.  They all start out with terms similar to "I think".  Please look up the word think and fact in the dictionary.  You can come back when you no longer believe those two words represent the same thing.  

Here's a fact check of my own so you can learn to argue properly.  

One if a person states something as fact then you can counter it with counter-evidence of your own.  

Two if nothing has been stated as fact, you can state your own opinion on what will happen and why you think that.  

All I did was represent an opinion which I feel strongly about.  You haven't disproven a damn thing so stop acting like you have because it's physically impossible until E3 comes around.  

Y'know these systems aren't really worth getting until E3 anyway...the highest games between them are ports.

I havin't seen any complaints about the PS4 games other than the "More indies? c'mon Sony we want more AAA's" bitchfest.

Besides, the biggest game on the Xbox One right now can also be bought on the 360 and PC.

You are always gonna be able to buy Xbox exclusives on the PC and 360.  Microsoft just doesn't care enough to really push their platform.  

Of course they aren't worth getting early.  I'm a Wii U owner.  My original opinion I think was that you should wait until E3 because I strongly suspect that Sony won't have the winning console advantage everyone thinks they are going to have.  However I didn't want an enormous wall of text so I deleted everything but the most recent part.  

The complaints were more that things like Infamous 2 and Metal Gear were supposed to be bigger titles and they barely crack 80 on metacritic.