By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - Microsoft is winning me over.

Capulous said:


Now many PS fans say it isn't the case as well. These type of arguments are useless because once the shoe is on the other foot, arguments flip. It doesn't stop people from using them constantly though. I recall when indies didn't matter, games on xbox and pc don't count because they were not exclusive to the xbox, and let's not go into paying for LIVE. Now look at those arguemnts.

well, yeah... Sony fans have evidence for that claim. The ps3 lol



Around the Network
Captain_Tom said:

Capulous said:


Now many PS fans say it isn't the case as well. These type of arguments are useless because once the shoe is on the other foot, arguments flip. It doesn't stop people from using them constantly though. I recall when indies didn't matter, games on xbox and pc don't count because they were not exclusive to the xbox, and let's not go into paying for LIVE. Now look at those arguemnts.


It is never just "Price" or any one factor.  It is always a myriad of factors.  Heck the Xbox One was $450 with a free AAA release and it still lost.  It clearly isn't just price.


I think you completely missed the point.



Max King of the Wild said:
Capulous said:


Now many PS fans say it isn't the case as well. These type of arguments are useless because once the shoe is on the other foot, arguments flip. It doesn't stop people from using them constantly though. I recall when indies didn't matter, games on xbox and pc don't count because they were not exclusive to the xbox, and let's not go into paying for LIVE. Now look at those arguemnts.

well, yeah... Sony fans have evidence for that claim. The ps3 lol

Sure they do, depending on who you ask.



Capulous said:


Sure they do, depending on who you ask.


and depending who you ask they are either right or wrong. despite being more expensive ps3 sold as much as the 360. In March a cheaper bundle got outsold in its best region. All the evidence supports price not being a factor forXB1



DonFerrari said:
jlmurph2 said:
Captain_Tom said:

Killzone, Infamous, Don't Starve, Resogun, and soon a slew of amazing games.  Look just because you don't want to play them, doesn't mean they don't exist...


Isn't the OP just saying what he's excited about/is interested in? Not exactly what Sony has.

He also says that nothing that PS4 have right now or will release in the near future is interesting... even said all games are crap besides Infamous SS.

Still sounds like his opinion to me. Not facts.



Around the Network
jlmurph2 said:
Captain_Tom said:
Mensrea said:

I'm a pretty huge Nintendo fan. Their output is the majority of my gaming time. I also really enjoy a sony machine on the side. I absolutely loved the PS3 (Best 7th gen console for me) and I jumped at a chance to buy a PS4 when it dropped. Microsoft has never really interested me. Halo was always kinda fun at parties, but other than that, they never did it for me. I have no interest in gears, did not want to pay for online, and don't play call of duty. 

This gen though, their output has been better than Sony's. There are many more games that I would really like to play on their console. Dead Rising 3, Forza, Titanfall, PVZ Garden Warfare, Peggle 2. They all really intrest me. These gameswouldn't have forced me to buy an Xbox One, but they did make me a tad jealous. 

Today I saw the trailer for Sunset Overdrive, and I tell you, this might be the game to push me over the edge. It's everything I want in a game. An original, off the wall story, awesome asthetic, fun looking gameplay. It looks like an orgasm on a blu ray disc. 

On Sony's side we have...Last of Us remake? :/

In short, Kudos to Microsoft. They really went crazy at the start of the generation with the DRM thing, but dammit, I really want to play the games that they are making. It is a gaint nutpunch to the effort that Sony has put out so far. And the PS4's future is still pretty bare from what I've seen. 

Killzone, Infamous, Don't Starve, Resogun, and soon a slew of amazing games.  Look just because you don't want to play them, doesn't mean they don't exist...


Isn't the OP just saying what he's excited about/is interested in? Not exactly what Sony has.


I'll admit I didn't read all of it, but either way I was responding to what I bolded...



Captain_Tom said:
jlmurph2 said:
Captain_Tom said:

Killzone, Infamous, Don't Starve, Resogun, and soon a slew of amazing games.  Look just because you don't want to play them, doesn't mean they don't exist...


Isn't the OP just saying what he's excited about/is interested in? Not exactly what Sony has.


I'll admit I didn't read all of it, but either way I was responding to what I bolded...


I see, well yeah he's saying that the Last of Us Remake is the only thing on PS4 he's interested in.



Capulous said:
Captain_Tom said:

Capulous said:


Now many PS fans say it isn't the case as well. These type of arguments are useless because once the shoe is on the other foot, arguments flip. It doesn't stop people from using them constantly though. I recall when indies didn't matter, games on xbox and pc don't count because they were not exclusive to the xbox, and let's not go into paying for LIVE. Now look at those arguemnts.


It is never just "Price" or any one factor.  It is always a myriad of factors.  Heck the Xbox One was $450 with a free AAA release and it still lost.  It clearly isn't just price.


I think you completely missed the point.


I got your point completily.  I wasn't arguing with you, just adding on to what you said.



jlmurph2 said:
DonFerrari said:
jlmurph2 said:
Captain_Tom said:

Killzone, Infamous, Don't Starve, Resogun, and soon a slew of amazing games.  Look just because you don't want to play them, doesn't mean they don't exist...


Isn't the OP just saying what he's excited about/is interested in? Not exactly what Sony has.

He also says that nothing that PS4 have right now or will release in the near future is interesting... even said all games are crap besides Infamous SS.

Still sounds like his opinion to me. Not facts.

He stated as fact, well most people here tend to post their opinion as facts and usually don't clarify. But you said "Not exactly what Sony has" and I was answering to it, that he explicitily puts that Sony don't have any games at all (and in this case don't matter much if saying as opinion or pretending to be fact), but the temptation for him to buy a X1 shouldn't have anything to do with PS4 performance or games... Is quite simples actually, if you like what X1 offers and have the money buy it, if not don't. And if it was a comparison case, you must choose one, choose the one you think will give you the best enjoyment for your buck.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Mensrea said:
Alot of people are really saying that the PS4 has all these exclusives coming up, I would love if they would try to name some. I would like to be proved wrong, but other than The Order and driveclub, I've seen nothing. And those two games look "meh".


lol

235 games

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_PlayStation_4_games

70+ are exclusive in some way

 

161 games

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Xbox_One_games

20+ are exclusive in some way

So yeah......