jlmurph2 said:
Still sounds like his opinion to me. Not facts. |
He stated as fact, well most people here tend to post their opinion as facts and usually don't clarify. But you said "Not exactly what Sony has" and I was answering to it, that he explicitily puts that Sony don't have any games at all (and in this case don't matter much if saying as opinion or pretending to be fact), but the temptation for him to buy a X1 shouldn't have anything to do with PS4 performance or games... Is quite simples actually, if you like what X1 offers and have the money buy it, if not don't. And if it was a comparison case, you must choose one, choose the one you think will give you the best enjoyment for your buck.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







