By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - [RUMOR] New Zelda E3 2014 leaked information

 

New Zelda

ALBW HD with multiplayer 29 21.17%
 
No Zelda for U 20 14.60%
 
More expensive than GTA 50 36.50%
 
2024 at the earliest 34 24.82%
 
Total:133

PLease be true, if this is true then GOTY 2014 and GOAT confirmed.



Around the Network

Every single point sounds great to me. I can even live with the removal of motion controls.

That said, I'd be surprised if even half of these things are true. Also, the treehouse thing sounds like a given, but if its releasing this year, I'd expect there to be a playable demo on the show floor.



Pavolink said:
Clyde32 said:
Pavolink, looks like you might just lose a bet if this releases in the holiday season.


What bet? I don't have any other than the SSB in my sign. Also, months ago I was one of the few that believes Zelda was ready for this holiday season. ????


Sorry bout that pavo. It wasn't you, it was Delphin with Curl-6 saying it wouldn't. Your negativity toward it being at e3 got me confused. 



Clyde32 said:
Pavolink said:
Clyde32 said:
Pavolink, looks like you might just lose a bet if this releases in the holiday season.


What bet? I don't have any other than the SSB in my sign. Also, months ago I was one of the few that believes Zelda was ready for this holiday season. ????


Sorry bout that pavo. It wasn't you, it was Delphin with Curl-6 saying it wouldn't. Your negativity toward it being at e3 got me confused. 


No problem.



Proud to be the first cool Nintendo fan ever

Number ONE Zelda fan in the Universe

DKCTF didn't move consoles

Prediction: No Zelda HD for Wii U, quietly moved to the succesor

Predictions for Nintendo NX and Mobile


Sounds needlessly bloated, though fake so no need to worry.



Around the Network

Would be nice if it was real; because it sounds excellent.

But that's what you'd expect from such a leak; such a vague one as well. That makes me question it's validity.



 

Here lies the dearly departed Nintendomination Thread.

I would never want a Zelda game to take 150 hours. Maybe they meant to say 15. Yes, that must be it...



noname2200 said:
I would never want a Zelda game to take 150 hours. Maybe they meant to say 15. Yes, that must be it...

I imagine much of that time will be from full exploration and sidequests (if true ofcourse)



 

Here lies the dearly departed Nintendomination Thread.

Soleron said:

This is vague and wishlist-like.

BubbleWS is not a source, as Gamespot found out

Haha, love the Gamespot update: "we always strive to be accurate. We just happened to do less than zero fact finding in this case. But if you ignore the ample amounts of times this has happened before, it's a one-off, we swear!"



Conegamer said:
noname2200 said:
I would never want a Zelda game to take 150 hours. Maybe they meant to say 15. Yes, that must be it...

I imagine much of that time will be from full exploration and sidequests (if true ofcourse)

I'd get sick of the game long before then. 100+ hour playthroughs should be reserved for MMOs only: I've sunk more than that into several games, but usually over multiple playthroughs. I already felt Twilight Princess dragged on for too long at the mid-40's: tripling that sounds bad.