Zero999 on 06 May 2014
| DialgaMarine said: I'm not sure why everyone is losing their minds about this. Beyond the resolution and framerate, the games graphics are really nothing to write home about. They're very cartoony with little detail, and I would be surprised if a system that came out less than 2 years ago could NOT run them at their fullest. Until the system can run a game like inFamous: SS in 1080p at 60 FPS, I'm really not impressed. People should be more focused on whether or not the title lives up to the Mario Kart name. |
Again with this? I must applaud such tenacity. But regardless of what you think or say, MK8 is a highly detailed and graphically intensive game. EVERYTHING in the game is perfectly/almost perfectly done: Poly count, textures quality, animation, scale, draw distance, resolution, framerate... and all a big step from any 7th gen game.
And a hint for the next time you use the "cartoony" argument: the difference between a cartoony and a realistic game is how the game looks. in terms of graphics, both use the same stuff and either side can be more intensive. ex: tlou is much more graphicaly intensive than super mario galaxy but MK8 is much more intensive than tlou.
