By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - How Vita could have been saved in 2013

Ganoncrotch on 14 April 2014
nitekrawler1285 said:

This isnt my opinion.  If you look at the definition of the word "no" as I have already so kindly provided from the oxford dictionary you can see it CAN be used to mean hardly any. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/no#no

If you actually read my words as they were intended we don't really disagree at all.  It seems you simply want me to say Sony put in hardly any effort.  I've already said that. I simply didn't use the same rhetoric that you did.  If you don't understand that I don't know what I can do to get you to understand past something I've already been warned asking you to do.  

I'm also not sure how I've attacked you oustide of implying that you don't understand how I am using the English language which seems to be true.

  

Ya think you could pull that argument off if a girl said no to having sex with you and you had hardly any sex with her? I'm just saying there is a huge gap between having none of something and having some of something.



Why not check me out on youtube and help me on the way to 2k subs over at www.youtube.com/stormcloudlive

Around the Network
nitekrawler1285 on 14 April 2014
ganoncrotch said:
nitekrawler1285 said:
 

This isnt my opinion.  If you look at the definition of the word "no" as I have already so kindly provided from the oxford dictionary you can see it CAN be used to mean hardly any. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/no#no

If you actually read my words as they were intended we don't really disagree at all.  It seems you simply want me to say Sony put in hardly any effort.  I've already said that. I simply didn't use the same rhetoric that you did.  If you don't understand that I don't know what I can do to get you to understand past something I've already been warned asking you to do.  

I'm also not sure how I've attacked you oustide of implying that you don't understand how I am using the English language which seems to be true.

  

Ya think you could pull that argument off if a girl said no to having sex with you and you had hardly any sex with her? I'm just saying there is a huge gap between having none of something and having some of something.

If you could describe to me what "hardly any "sex is I probably could. I'm not sure what "hardly any" sex would be as even oral sex and petting count as sex.  

It is only your opinion that there is a huge gap between hardly and no. Just as being back in no time doesn't mean they were back in 0 seconds I can say Sony put in no effort and they have released more than 0 titles. Please make sure to review the listed definitions and examples for reference of ways in which both words can be used. 

hardly:  http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/hardly
no:  http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/no#no



Ganoncrotch on 14 April 2014
nitekrawler1285 said:
ganoncrotch said:
nitekrawler1285 said:
 

This isnt my opinion.  If you look at the definition of the word "no" as I have already so kindly provided from the oxford dictionary you can see it CAN be used to mean hardly any. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/no#no

If you actually read my words as they were intended we don't really disagree at all.  It seems you simply want me to say Sony put in hardly any effort.  I've already said that. I simply didn't use the same rhetoric that you did.  If you don't understand that I don't know what I can do to get you to understand past something I've already been warned asking you to do.  

I'm also not sure how I've attacked you oustide of implying that you don't understand how I am using the English language which seems to be true.

  

Ya think you could pull that argument off if a girl said no to having sex with you and you had hardly any sex with her? I'm just saying there is a huge gap between having none of something and having some of something.

If you could describe to me what "hardly any "sex is I probably could. I'm not sure what "hardly any" sex would be as even oral sex and petting count as sex.  

It is only your opinion that there is a huge gap between hardly and no. Just as being back in no time doesn't mean they were back in 0 seconds I can say Sony put in no effort and they have released more than 0 titles. Please make sure to review the listed definitions and examples for reference of ways in which both words can be used. 

hardly:  http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/hardly
no:  http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/no#no


No to sex would be, No you don't have sex with the person.

If you were to say that full Intercourse would take 10-15mins with someone, you could then suggest that having sex with someone for 30 seconds was therefore hardly any sex in comparison to full intercourse... it would still be rape tho if she had said no to it. I'm not sure what is hard to grasp here.

Tell ya what I'm going to give you no further replies to this and you can see if I can give you an example of what the difference is.

 

OT - I would say sorry for derailing a Vita saved / Doomed thread but I see on the front page there are 2 more of them made in the past 48 hours so this one becoming English 101 could be more useful.



Why not check me out on youtube and help me on the way to 2k subs over at www.youtube.com/stormcloudlive

MRKs on 14 April 2014

Agree completely on GoW and GT, not so sure about the calling functionality.

The vita needed good exclusives for the western market in order to attract western companies, but well, they pretty much let vita die.

Would the vita be the last Sony handheld?



3DS FC :  4339 - 3326 - 7693. Add me :) Nickname Tin

nitekrawler1285 on 14 April 2014
ganoncrotch said


No to sex would be, No you don't have sex with the person.

If you were to say that full Intercourse would take 10-15mins with someone, you could then suggest that having sex with someone for 30 seconds was therefore hardly any sex in comparison to full intercourse... it would still be rape tho if she had said no to it. I'm not sure what is hard to grasp here.

Tell ya what I'm going to give you no further replies to this and you can see if I can give you an example of what the difference is.

 

OT - I would say sorry for derailing a Vita saved / Doomed thread but I see on the front page there are 2 more of them made in the past 48 hours so this one becoming English 101 could be more useful.

Hardly any sex is what is so hard to grasp here. I would never define sex is in degrees based on length of the sex act.  If I engage in a sex act with someone for 15 minutes or for 30 seconds I had sex.  I would only use "hardly any sex" to suggest I had been engaging in sex acts less frequently than is normal for me.  I might describe 30 seconds of sex as short and probably unsatisfying sex but definitely not as hardly any sex. 

Googling hardly any sex leads to a page about people talking about frenquency between the sexual acts as well and not the lenght of their copulation.  

 

 




Around the Network
SnowPrince on 14 April 2014

YES, definitely. GT6 should have been on Vita instead, GoW Ascension would be a success too. We all agree on that.
And also, if Sony really wants Vita to survive they should command ND to develop some IP for it, I know it's gonna be costy, ND is a big developer with bigger allocated resources but it's worth a shot.



Ganoncrotch on 14 April 2014
SnowPrince said:
YES, definitely. GT6 should have been on Vita instead, GoW Ascension would be a success too. We all agree on that.
And also, if Sony really wants Vita to survive they should command ND to develop some IP for it, I know it's gonna be costy, ND is a big developer with bigger allocated resources but it's worth a shot.


It's kind of sad to see if you click on psp essentials the Gran turismo psp game is top of the list for the vita... which is a sad shell of a Gran turismo game tbh. Would have been great for Sonys flagship driving sim to head to the Vita woulda made it feel more like Sony believed it was worthy of holding the torch.



Why not check me out on youtube and help me on the way to 2k subs over at www.youtube.com/stormcloudlive

Ucell on 20 April 2014
ganoncrotch said:
SnowPrince said:
YES, definitely. GT6 should have been on Vita instead, GoW Ascension would be a success too. We all agree on that.
And also, if Sony really wants Vita to survive they should command ND to develop some IP for it, I know it's gonna be costy, ND is a big developer with bigger allocated resources but it's worth a shot.


It's kind of sad to see if you click on psp essentials the Gran turismo psp game is top of the list for the vita... which is a sad shell of a Gran turismo game tbh. Would have been great for Sonys flagship driving sim to head to the Vita woulda made it feel more like Sony believed it was worthy of holding the torch.

It actually shows the potential system seller a GT Vita can be.