How Vita could have been saved in 2013

[nitekrawler1285]

ganoncrotch said:

nitekrawler1285 said:

 

This isnt my opinion.  If you look at the definition of the word "no" as I have already so kindly provided from the oxford dictionary you can see it CAN be used to mean hardly any. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/no#no

If you actually read my words as they were intended we don't really disagree at all.  It seems you simply want me to say Sony put in hardly any effort.  I've already said that. I simply didn't use the same rhetoric that you did.  If you don't understand that I don't know what I can do to get you to understand past something I've already been warned asking you to do.  

I'm also not sure how I've attacked you oustide of implying that you don't understand how I am using the English language which seems to be true.

  

Ya think you could pull that argument off if a girl said no to having sex with you and you had hardly any sex with her? I'm just saying there is a huge gap between having none of something and having some of something.

If you could describe to me what "hardly any "sex is I probably could. I'm not sure what "hardly any" sex would be as even oral sex and petting count as sex.  

It is only your opinion that there is a huge gap between hardly and no. Just as being back in no time doesn't mean they were back in 0 seconds I can say Sony put in no effort and they have released more than 0 titles. Please make sure to review the listed definitions and examples for reference of ways in which both words can be used. 

hardly:  http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/hardly
no:  http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/no#no