We can't control the stupidity of casuals. Come back when you have a solution.
We can't control the stupidity of casuals. Come back when you have a solution.
The games industry "we" deserve, but not the one "we" need.
Regardless, it's the one "we" voted for by striving for this kind of stuff at the expense of everything else.
Time to sleep in the bed you've shat in. I'll be in the shed, where I have been since 1996.
WHERE IS MY KORORINPA 3
Gnac said:
Man, these fucking casuals are everywhere, aren't they? It's like they have all the buying power, or something. |
I think he's just using the old-school terms. Remember how the Madden/FIFA/PlayStation kiddos were the casuals back in the PS1 days? That's who he's referring to. He's just a bit confused because he just got out of extended hibernation or something, I dunno.
I'm confused
"We" means you and one or more other people together, single-handedly means alone without help. Are you saying that everyone on this site is killing gaming? Or that you by yourself are killing gaming?
Because I don't think either is true.
@TheVoxelman on twitter
I agree, everytime we buy a generic shooter, we kill gaming a little bit.
WagnerPaiva said: I agree, everytime we buy a generic shooter, we kill gaming a little bit. |
This is a fantastic example of sentence redundancy! We need more "very unique" shooters.
WHERE IS MY KORORINPA 3
RolStoppable said: It all went downhill with the rise of PlayStation. Like every fourth million seller on the systems is an EA game. And Sony has the nerve to use the slogan "This is for the players.", how about they actually care about real gamers for once? |
I think we should boycott them, maybe stop buying their games on certain systems, and perhaps stop then from publishing games for some platforms altogether.
Is it really possible to say "we" and "single-handedly"?
@OP Casuals will be casuals
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.