By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Should ubisoft cancel/delay the watch dogs pc version?

bonzobanana on 30 March 2014
BasilZero said:

No, dont cancel it, if anything cancel the WiiU version lol.









 

 

 

 

 

 













Now now dont get mad at me n_n


wii u version is probably already cancelled and if it isn't, probably when wii u owners see it they'll wish it had been.

I think my pc will pull off a version somewhere between xbone and ps4.



Around the Network
mine on 30 March 2014
oniyide said:

You're not the only one. People here make me laugh, the reality of the situation is that most people current PC arent going to push graphics much better than their home consoles, especially PS4 and Xbox1. Fact is their are very few people out their that is going to go the extra mile and get graphic cards more ram to even get it to current gen levels. They would rather pay the 400-500 dollars and not deal with the hassle.

Yeah. It's a tough decission to pay 200 bucks for a new Nvidia Maxwell GPU which easily handles > 60 fps or 400-500 for a next gen console who strugle at 30-45 fps... 

GPU and "quality of pixels" are progressing that fast that even Microsoft and Sony choose the "Nintendo way" - instead of selling high-end at a fraction of PC costs they sell you this time middle-class (at best) GPUs for some bucks less. This "next gen" has by far the least value compared to PCs. And as Pascal-GPUs with a 3x improvment are "just around the corner" (2016) I wonder what that means to Microsoft and Sony. As Steam and others are new contenders which simply have the freedom to redefine what a "console" is like



oniyide on 30 March 2014
mine said:
oniyide said:

You're not the only one. People here make me laugh, the reality of the situation is that most people current PC arent going to push graphics much better than their home consoles, especially PS4 and Xbox1. Fact is their are very few people out their that is going to go the extra mile and get graphic cards more ram to even get it to current gen levels. They would rather pay the 400-500 dollars and not deal with the hassle.

Yeah. It's a tough decission to pay 200 bucks for a new Nvidia Maxwell GPU which easily handles > 60 fps or 400-500 for a next gen console who strugle at 30-45 fps... 

GPU and "quality of pixels" are progressing that fast that even Microsoft and Sony choose the "Nintendo way" - instead of selling high-end at a fraction of PC costs they sell you this time middle-class (at best) GPUs for some bucks less. This "next gen" has by far the least value compared to PCs. And as Pascal-GPUs with a 3x improvment are "just around the corner" (2016) I wonder what that means to Microsoft and Sony. As Steam and others are new contenders which simply have the freedom to redefine what a "console" is like

speak for yourself. It will take my laptop alot more than a new GPU to get it up to pS4 level. Its not even on PS3. Hell its already 3 years old. And thats my point. Not one size fits all when it comes to PC.



jlmurph2 on 30 March 2014

Rockstar haven't announced a PC/8th gen version of GTA V because they dont need it. It's already sold more than enough.



Mystro-Sama on 30 March 2014
oniyide said:
MTZehvor said:
I'm gonna go ahead and admit it now: My PC's graphics don't look that much better than last gen's. :(

I also have absolutely no idea what the OP is talking about but I felt that was worth confessing anyway.


You're not the only one. People here make me laugh, the reality of the situation is that most people current PC arent going to push graphics much better than their home consoles, especially PS4 and Xbox1. Fact is their are very few people out their that is going to go the extra mile and get graphic cards more ram to even get it to current gen levels. They would rather pay the 400-500 dollars and not deal with the hassle.

 

Wait wait wait... So everyone one on the internet DOESN'T have 4k monitors, Nvidia Titans with i7-3970k!? :O



Around the Network
Zkuq on 30 March 2014

If there's any damage to be done, it's already been done. Launch window comparisons won't matter much between PC and console because people always know in advance PC version's going to be the best.



BenVTrigger on 30 March 2014
Mystro-Sama said:
oniyide said:

You're not the only one. People here make me laugh, the reality of the situation is that most people current PC arent going to push graphics much better than their home consoles, especially PS4 and Xbox1. Fact is their are very few people out their that is going to go the extra mile and get graphic cards more ram to even get it to current gen levels. They would rather pay the 400-500 dollars and not deal with the hassle.

 

Wait wait wait... So everyone one on the internet DOESN'T have 4k monitors, Nvidia Titans with i7-3970k!? :O


Nope some of us have rigs much stronger than that.

Also why would they delay the PC version just because it will look superior to consoles? Everyone already knows it will anyways 



zarx on 30 March 2014

Yes definitely



They should also cancel the PS4 and XBOne versions as they make the PS360 versions look bad.



@TheVoxelman on twitter

Check out my hype threads: Cyberpunk, and The Witcher 3!

Seihaku on 30 March 2014

Assassin's Creed IV PC makes the console versions look weak on $200 graphic cards, so they should retroactively cancel that as well.



Dgc1808 on 30 March 2014

No. That's a terrible idea. Your ideas are terrible and you should feel bad.



4 ≈ One