In a developing story we've recieved word that both Infamous: Second Son and Titanfall are indeed fun to play. 

Unfortunatley the critics don't care because Titanfall doesn't have a proper campaign while Infamous's side missions are repetitive and the story isn't perfect. 

In a related story it seems popular game review sites such as IGN, Gamespot, Gametrailers, and Eurogamer are trying to change the definition of "fun" to include phrases like "functionally perfect" and "with no errors" as well as "only good if completely different from last generation consoles which are the Xbox 360, Ps3, and Wii" oh and also "can't be done on PC". 

Thoughts?

This is a crazy story I hope it's true.

Can't be that fun if they're both in the 80's on Metacritic.

amirite guys? huh?? Guys...?

Clever OP.

Hold on, one game has very little in the way of a story and is online only. The other is single player only and it's story doesn't seemed to have developed since the last games (kinda like a sequal) but they are both fun?

... you know, this puts everything into perspective. How can I trust review scores now when a game can be fun regardless of content? It's like scores are meaningless or something as long as you are having fun.

Below 96 and fun? Not sure if serious?

IKR. I liked how you did this instead of some rant. Good job!

BLASPHEMY!!! how dare speak such words on this forum!!!

now this this a great thread!

I'm not touching anything below 90 meta, even with a stick.

I would rank Titanfall, Forza 5 and Dead Rising 3 all above Infamous SS in fun factor and replay value.