By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - What do you consider a bad Meta score for video games?

 

Bad Meta score?

Anything below a 90 17 5.78%
 
Anything below a 80 36 12.24%
 
Anything below a 70 128 43.54%
 
Anything below a 60 76 25.85%
 
Anything 0-59 30 10.20%
 
Unless it's a perfect 100 it's bad. 7 2.38%
 
Total:294

I'll be honest I don't pay much attention to Metacritic anymore but when I used to it was more of a sliding scale, so you'd probably have to get into the 50s for an auto-turn off, above that and I would just use my personal taste to decide what to buy and for how much, as well as impressions from forums and things.

I think it's mainly because I like Dynasty Warriors - it never does that well, but I love it :)



Around the Network
Kyuu said:
I wouldn't bother myself with anything below 80. But Knack, the Mario-Killer, is an exception.


You think Knack is better than Mario. That's cute.



I predict NX launches in 2017 - not 2016

73 lol but I dont really follow reviews so idc



BAD http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/basement-crawl

7 for me is meh or average too.

Above 8 is good.



theprof00 said:
Q: what do you consider a bad Meta score for video games?
A: whatever titanfall ends up at
:D

Oh you



Around the Network

59 and lower. Above that, any game has potential.



Under 70. Normally I'd consider 60 BARELY good but this is about Metascores and that's a different story.



NobleTeam360 said:
theprof00 said:
Q: what do you consider a bad Meta score for video games?
A: whatever titanfall ends up at
:D

Oh you

haha, and slad6alpha said 87 :D:D:D:D



Anything below 75 for me at metacritic i consider bad in general tbh.

Except certain games that i was planning to buy no matter what the the critic scores was... Example: Beyond: Two Souls.



Where the icon changes from green to yellow, it makes me sad :(