wow my 1st page message was surprisingly agreed with. Superchunk.......heed my advice. "Wait" being my condensed answer to you.
wow my 1st page message was surprisingly agreed with. Superchunk.......heed my advice. "Wait" being my condensed answer to you.
lucidium said:
Nobody cares. |
Not offense to OP, but sadly they do and you do too (and me) because this thread got over 200 replies in less than a day.
ninetailschris said:
Not only is this true but it's question begging because there are obvious new games which you will ignore. Then we have ask about gameplay. If you produce a ip for years that are first person shooter and than you make a new ip that is a first person shooter that play extremely similar to other shooters is that really new? Does gameplay make something new or just name alone? This up to the person.
OP, currently I'm going Pc and wiiu. Same reasons why I am not buying ps4 or xbone1. Plus,never enjoyed Sony first party. Mircosoft ips I don't enjoy anymore.
|
So many new, mega hit games you and everyone else never mentions them. Wow, they must be something special!
A new storyline is nice, along with setting and characters. Having the same shallow as hell junk year on year is a poor show. Yes, the last gen was very poor for new games, but it did better than Nintendo over the last 15 years. Both gameplay and setting etc make it new. This is why I hate the CoD series as it is the same game reboxed half a dozen times, however Nintendo do take the crown for modelling an entire company on that basis.
superchunk said:
Just because something retains its full value over time does not mean its somehow bad. Fact is mario, zelda and other games are supremely popular for the entire life of the hardware and well after where the games 3rd parties shovel out are proven to be worthless a month later. |
The reason they are full priced even years after their launches is that they are pretty much all you can play on a Nintendo system. When you have constant flow of games coming in, the older games drop their values because people always have something new to play.
Kane1389 said:
If you wanna look at the statistics, SCE had way more 90+ games than Nintendo in every gen so far. The quality gap is actually huge |
Yeah, because metacritic numbers totally = obvious high quality.
And even if you want to go that route, ON Metacritic, out of the Top 20 "highest rated" games of all time (of the modern era), 6 of them are Nintendo developed/published titles, and not a single one of them is a Sony published game. Out of the Top 50? 12 of them are Nintendo titles, and 5 of them are Sony titles.
So that logic works out well, yes?
DevilRising said:
|
How many of those games are lik LTTP and OOT where metacritic counted like 10 reviews for a game? Today's games have well over 70 reviews for a game
A 90+ game in 94' isnt the same as 90+ game in 14'. There is a 20 years gap, the standards have been set significatly higher .
Last Generation of 90% games published by Nintendo vs Sony.
Super Mario Galaxy
Super Mario Galaxy 2
Zelda Twilight Princess (not sure if I should count this one since it was last generation game as well)
Super Smash Brothers Brawl
Zelda Skyward Sword
Xenoblade Chronicles
Metroid Prime 3: Corruption
Metroid Prime Trilogy (again not sure if this one counts)
--------------
Total 6 or 8 titles for the WII published by Nintendo.
Little Big Planet
Little Big Planet 2
Uncharted 2
Uncharted 3
The Last of Us
God of War 3
Journey (not sure if you count indie games)
MLB 2009
MLB 2010 The Show
MLB 2011
Killzone 2
Ico and Shadow of Colossus (if you counted Zelda TP then you should count these ones as well)
God of War collection (dittio)
That's 11 or 13 titles published by Sony during the PS3.
TheJimbo1234 said:
So many new, mega hit games you and everyone else never mentions them. Wow, they must be something special! A new storyline is nice, along with setting and characters. Having the same shallow as hell junk year on year is a poor show. Yes, the last gen was very poor for new games, but it did better than Nintendo over the last 15 years. Both gameplay and setting etc make it new. This is why I hate the CoD series as it is the same game reboxed half a dozen times, however Nintendo do take the crown for modelling an entire company on that basis. |
Actually I owned a ps3 and xbox360. The fact is i played lots of games besides indies. I came to the realization that the creativity and new gameplay ideas that aren't first person shooters that have high quality is nintendo. You can disagree but my obvervation I seen nothing that was quality and creative on the twins. To me video game storys are horrible because i love to watch classic movies so I have standard. There was reason i knew the plot of last of us in 20 minutes in. If care about stories good for you but still me the garbage is great and missing some great untold stories. If critics could actually grade video stories it would be low 50's. I like my stories simple like oot not sme borng cutscene mess where I have to stop playing ever 20 minutes (last of us).
Tell me one sony game that made the jump in story teling design and gameplay like Majora Mask? Or even Skyward Sword. Uncharted follows the same design and story in every sequal. So, give your myth story to someone buying because i'm not interested.
"Excuse me sir, I see you have a weapon. Why don't you put it down and let's settle this like gentlemen" ~ max
Moral of the story: a gamers opinion is as susceptible to change as the wind.