DevilRising said:
Kane1389 said:
Geo said: "Nintendo content is superb and well beyond the quality and games-craftsmanship of anyone else." Stopped reading. |
Yeah, same here. What a load of bullshit.
If you wanna look at the statistics, SCE had way more 90+ games than Nintendo in every gen so far. The quality gap is actually huge
|
Yeah, because metacritic numbers totally = obvious high quality.
And even if you want to go that route, ON Metacritic, out of the Top 20 "highest rated" games of all time (of the modern era), 6 of them are Nintendo developed/published titles, and not a single one of them is a Sony published game. Out of the Top 50? 12 of them are Nintendo titles, and 5 of them are Sony titles.
So that logic works out well, yes?
|
How many of those games are lik LTTP and OOT where metacritic counted like 10 reviews for a game? Today's games have well over 70 reviews for a game
A 90+ game in 94' isnt the same as 90+ game in 14'. There is a 20 years gap, the standards have been set significatly higher .