By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Are you ready to go back to Omaha Beach?

 

Which is better (for a nex-gen shooter)?

WW 2 47 60.26%
 
WW 3 11 14.10%
 
sci-fi 20 25.64%
 
Total:78
LemonSlice said:

It's not like World at War sold badly either; 14 million on last gen consoles, best selling WW2 shooter of all time. And they just abandonded them for even better selling modern warfare stuff. If they'd come back, esp from Activision, I'd welcome them with open arms.

world at war sold so well cause it a Call of Duty and back then FPS genre was BIG

people in USA were mad about Halo and Call of Duty

 

Halo and call of duty both are declining right now



Around the Network
ps3-sales! said:


You've got to be joking. 

Not sure if serious... But while COD is certainly not a graphical showcase, there's no question that Ghosts looks next gen compared to World at War. 

WHAT?

all Call of Duty's since Modern Warfare have looked the same

its not just Activision greediness and Laziness that stop Graphical leep,its Call of Duty's art style.Its just Dry and the game is more gameplay focused.

 

put it next to Battlefield and see.better,put it next to KILLZONE SHADOWFALL and see.they both crush COD

 

also you can't do much on the graphic front apart from whats already done in last generation games.And you do even less on a WW2 shooter as those days things were underdeloped as in case of lanscape and just slow.



Whats Omaha Beach??



I'd settle for an fps you can't beat in 5 hours.



ktay95 said:
Whats Omaha Beach??